Confucianism tends to play only a marginal role in current theorizing about justice, which is a global pursuit dominated by Western theory and its strong tendency to assume that justice refers to some substantive conception of distributive, socioeconomic justice. This article examines and compares reconstructions of Confucian justice by Joseph Chan, May Sim, and Fan Ruiping. Each reconstruction makes reference to both classical and modern Western justice theory and thus each involves a comparative approach; indeed, each reconstruction seeks ultimately, in its own distinctive fashion, to present a version of Confucian justice that is comparable with modern Western justice theory. In this article we assess, critically and comparatively, the tertium comparationis and the arguments in each reconstruction. While our analysis does not wholly endorse any of the reconstructions, it shows that there is a richness and vitality to Confucian justice theory that merits proper consideration in justice theory conceived as a truly global and cosmopolitan discipline.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2gYDFp1
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Purpose: The MHC-unrestricted activity of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells against chemo-surviving melanoma cancer stem cells (mCSC) was...
-
Abstract This paper addresses the hybrid consensus-based formation keeping problem for nonholonomic mobile robots in the presence of a nov...
-
Induced overexpression of CD44 associated with resistance to apoptosis on DNA damage response in human head and neck squamous cell carc...
-
9780275967376 0275967379 Realism and American Foreign Policy - Wilsonians and the Kennan-Morgenthau Thesis, Steven J. Bucklin Vin Diesel, Pa...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου