Τρίτη 4 Οκτωβρίου 2022

Bupivacaine inhibits the TLR4 ‐ and TLR2 ‐ Myd88/NF‐κB pathways in human leukocytes

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

Local anesthetics have anti-inflammatory effects. Because most previous experiments were performed with supra-therapeutic concentrations, we measured the effects of clinically relevant concentrations of bupivacaine on the TLR4- and TLR2-MyD88-NF-κB pathways.

Methods

We measured TNF-α and PGE2 release, p38 MAP-kinase phosphorylation and translocation of NF-κB in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMC) and human monocytes challenged with LPS (lipopolysaccharide) or Pam3CSK4 (tripalmitoylated lipopeptide Pam3CysSerLys4) in the presence or absence of bupivacaine. Similarly, we measured the effect of bupivacaine on HEK293 cells expressing the hTLR4 and the hTLR2 genes and challenged with LPS or Pam3CSK4. Finally, molecular docking simulations of R(+)- and S(-)-bupivacaine binding to the TLR4-MD-2 complex and to the TLR2/TLR1 heterodimer were performed.

Results

In PBMCs, bupivacaine from 0.1 to 100 μM inhibited LPS-induced TNF-α and PGE2 secretion, phosphorylation of p38 and nuclear translocation of NF-κB in monocytes. Bupivacaine similarly inhibited the effects of Pam3CSK4 on TNF-α secretion. Bupivacaine inhibited the effect of LPS on HEK293 cells expressing the human TLR4 receptor and the effect of Pam3CSK4 on HEK293 cells expressing the human TLR2 receptor. Molecular docking showed that bupivacaine binds to the MD-2 co-receptor of TLR4 and to the TLR2 receptor.

Conclusions

Contrary to numerous experiments performed with supratherapeutic doses, our results were obtained with concentrations of bupivacaine as low as 0.1 μM. We conclude that bupivacaine modulates the inflammatory reactions such as those observed after surgery or trauma, at least partly by inhibiting the TLR4- and TLR2-NF-κB pathways.

View on Web

Estimation of the time-varying incremental effect of low dose aspirin on incidence of pregnancy

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

SocialThumb.00001648.DC.jpeg

Background. In many research settings, the intervention implied by the average causal effect of a time-varying exposure is impractical or unrealistic, and we might instead prefer a more realistic target estimand. Instead of requiring all individuals to be always exposed vs. unexposed, incremental effects quantify the impact of merely shifting each individual's probability of being exposed. Methods. We demonstrate estimation of incremental effects in the time-varying setting, using data from the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial, which assessed the effect of preconception low-dose aspirin on pregnancy outcomes. Compliance to aspirin or placebo was summarized weekly and was affected by time-varying confounders such as bleeding or nausea. We sought to estimate what the incidence of pregnancy by 26 weeks post-randomization would have been if we shifted each participant's probability of taking aspirin or placebo in each week by odds ratios (OR) between 0.30 and 3.00. Results. Under no intervention (OR=1), the incidence of pregnancy was 77% (95% CI: 74%, 80%). Decreasing women's probability of complying with aspirin had little estimated effect on pregnancy incidence. When we increased women's probability of taking aspirin, estimated incidence of pregnancy increased, from 83% (95% CI: 79%, 87%) for OR=2 to 89% (95% CI: 84%, 93%) for OR=3. We observed similar results when we shifted women's probability of complying with placebo. Conclusions. These results estimated that realistic interventions to increase women's probability of taking aspirin would have yielded little to no impact on the incidence of pregnancy, relative to similar interventions on placebo. Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
View on Web

Polyethylenglycol – Freund oder Feind?

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Twitter_Summary_Default.jpg

Laryngorhinootologie 2022; 101: 784-786
DOI: 10.1055/a-1861-7047

Anaphylaktische Reaktionen nach Impfungen sind selten. Zwei Fälle von Reaktionen nach der Pfizer-BioNTech-Covid-19-Vakzine, BNT162b2, wurden aus dem UK berichtet, weitere 19 aus den USA. Als möglicher Auslöser wurde Polyethylenglycol (PEG) angeschuldigt. Pegylierung ist ein üblicher Vorgang in der Impfstoffherstellung, um die Substanzen vor schnellem immunologischem Abbau zu schützen. PEG ist ein Polyether (Synonyme z. B. Laureth-9, Polidocanol, Thesit, Macrogol) und findet sich in Kosmetika, Körperpflegeprodukten, Nahrungsmitteln, Liposomen und Nanopartikeln als Drug-Delivery-Systeme für Medikamente und als osmotisches Laxans vor Gastro-/Koloskopien. IgM-Antikörper auf PEG werden bei 70% der Bevölkerung nachgewiesen. Bei 2 Fällen von Soforttyp-Reaktionen auf PEG fanden sich IgE-Antiköper, bei anderen Medikamentengaben mit PEG geht man von pseudoallergischen Reaktionen über die Komplement-Aktivierungs-related Pseudoallergie (CARPA) aus. In Relation zum weit verbreiteten Einsatz von PEG sind die Impfreaktionen sehr selten und aktuell kein Grund, Allergiker oder Menschen mit Anaphylaxien bei entsprechenden Vorsichtsmaßnahmen auf bekannte Auslöser auszuschließen. Aufgrund der Meldepflicht (Gesundheitsamt und Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft) ist bald mit weiteren Erkenntnissen zu rechnen.
[...]

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Article in Thieme eJournals:
Table of contents  |  Abstract  |  Full text

View on Web

Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις