In the phase 3 clinical trial by John Yaxley and colleagues,1 the only significant differences between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted prostatectomy were observed in hospital stay, blood loss, duration of surgery (minutes), time in operating room (minutes), and stress levels, which were all lower in the robot-assisted surgery group. However, the authors did not perform a cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness study, which could be very interesting because there are no significant differences in oncological or functional outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lwIaqy
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objectives Greece is one of the leading tobacco-producing countries in European Union, and every year over 19 000 Greeks die from tobacco-at...
-
Objectives Drug interactions, poor adherence to medication and high-risk sexual behaviour may occur in individuals with HIV using recreation...
-
Abstract Background Mature T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell lymphomas compose a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and ext...
-
Introduction Multimorbidity (MM) refers to the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions within one person, where no one condition is co...
-
Objective To describe the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and sight-threatening DR (STDR) among Chinese adults with dia...
-
Related Articles Three job stress models and their relationship with musculoskeletal pain in blue- and white-collar workers. J Psycho...
-
<span class="paragraphSection"><div class="boxTitle">Abstract</div>Masked hypertension (MHT), defined ...
-
Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission is known to occur through direct contact with infected blood. There has been some suspicion ...
-
In Rwanda, the prevalence of viral hepatitis (HCV) is poorly understood. The current study investigated the prevalence and risk factors of H...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου