In the phase 3 clinical trial by John Yaxley and colleagues,1 the only significant differences between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted prostatectomy were observed in hospital stay, blood loss, duration of surgery (minutes), time in operating room (minutes), and stress levels, which were all lower in the robot-assisted surgery group. However, the authors did not perform a cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness study, which could be very interesting because there are no significant differences in oncological or functional outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lwIaqy
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Kenaf is a multipurpose crop, but a lack of genetic information hinders genetic and molecular research. In this study, we aimed t...
-
As demonstrated by the market reactions to downgrades of various sovereign credit ratings in 2011, the credit rating agencies occupy an impo...
-
Spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma is an uncommonly encountered benign neoplasm that is usually found in the subcutaneous tissues. Rare cases r...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2iI98XR via IFTTT
-
ORIGINAL ARTICLES Cyclooxygenase-2 and estrogen receptor-β as possible therapeutic targets in desmoid tumors p. 47 Rasha A Khairy DOI :10....
-
Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them Cystic echinococcosis in unaccompanied minor refugees from Afghanistan and the Middle E...
-
Abstract Despite the recent promising results of clinical trials using human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-based cell therapies for age-rel...
-
Lichtenstein intervention is currently the classic model of the regulated treatment of inguinal hernias by direct local approach. This “tens...
-
2016-09-29T05-30-58Z Source: Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Sadhana Nittur Holla, Meena Kumari Kamal Kishore, Mohan Babu Amber...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου