Publication date: December 2017
Source:European Journal of Radiology, Volume 97
Author(s): David Bunting, Tim Bracey, Bruce Fox, Richard Berrisford, Tim Wheatley, Grant Sanders
IntroductionAccuracy of locoregional staging in patients with oesophageal cancer is critical in determining operability and the need for neoadjuvant treatment. Imaging technology has advanced significantly in recent years but it is not known whether this translates to improved staging accuracy. This study investigates staging accuracy in relation to CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage. It specifically addresses the accuracy of staging with respect to the threshold for administering neoadjuvant therapies.Materials and methodsPre-operative staging according to CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage were compared to the postoperative histological staging in 133 patients undergoing potentially curative surgery (without neoadjuvant therapy) for oesophageal cancer between January 2010 and January 2015. T and N stage accuracies were reported separately for each imaging modality. Patients were also divided into two groups depending on whether the final pre-operative stage was below (≤T2, N0, early tumours) or above (≥T3 and/or ≥N1, locally advanced tumours) the threshold for offering neoadjuvant therapy. Accuracy of pre-operative staging was then analysed with respect to identification of patients below/above this threshold. The additional benefit offered by EUS for this purpose was investigated.ResultsT stage accuracies were 72.6%, 76.7% and 79.3% for CT, EUS and final pre-operative stage respectively. N stage accuracies were 75.6%, 77.2%, 74.5% and 78.6% for CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage respectively. Staging accuracy with respect to threshold for neoadjuvant treatment showed 62.0% early tumours were correctly staged and 80.5% advanced tumours were correctly staged. Whether or not patients underwent EUS did not affect the staging accuracy with respect to neoadjuvant treatment threshold.ConclusionsStaging accuracy with respect to the threshold for treatment with neoadjuvant therapy is poor, leading to potential over/under treatment. Predicting individual response to neoadjuvant therapy would provide a better way to determine which patients should receive this additional treatment.
from Imaging via alkiviadis.1961 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2hBZ2cz
Σάββατο 18 Νοεμβρίου 2017
Loco-regional staging accuracy in oesophageal cancer—How good are we in the modern era?
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Bromodomain proteins function as epigenetic readers that recognize acetylated histone tails to facilitate the transcription of t...
-
Objectives To optimise medical students’ early clerkship is a complex task since it is conducted in a context primarily organised to take ca...
-
Abstract Purpose Overcoming the flaws of current data management conditions in head and neck oncology could enable integrated informatio...
-
C. Julian Chen'Correspondence information about the author C. Julian ChenEmail the author C. Julian Chen, Donald A. Miller DOI: https://...
-
ACS Nano DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00032 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lNPpuk via...
-
Abstract Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a group of 209 congeners that differ in the number and position of chlorines on the biphenyl rin...
-
1 abqls-210rm.html Read the latest Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology - Vol. 37, No. 1, January 2020.eml 2 agx3v-nxz96.html Read the late...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου