Publication date: December 2017
Source:European Journal of Radiology, Volume 97
Author(s): David Bunting, Tim Bracey, Bruce Fox, Richard Berrisford, Tim Wheatley, Grant Sanders
IntroductionAccuracy of locoregional staging in patients with oesophageal cancer is critical in determining operability and the need for neoadjuvant treatment. Imaging technology has advanced significantly in recent years but it is not known whether this translates to improved staging accuracy. This study investigates staging accuracy in relation to CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage. It specifically addresses the accuracy of staging with respect to the threshold for administering neoadjuvant therapies.Materials and methodsPre-operative staging according to CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage were compared to the postoperative histological staging in 133 patients undergoing potentially curative surgery (without neoadjuvant therapy) for oesophageal cancer between January 2010 and January 2015. T and N stage accuracies were reported separately for each imaging modality. Patients were also divided into two groups depending on whether the final pre-operative stage was below (≤T2, N0, early tumours) or above (≥T3 and/or ≥N1, locally advanced tumours) the threshold for offering neoadjuvant therapy. Accuracy of pre-operative staging was then analysed with respect to identification of patients below/above this threshold. The additional benefit offered by EUS for this purpose was investigated.ResultsT stage accuracies were 72.6%, 76.7% and 79.3% for CT, EUS and final pre-operative stage respectively. N stage accuracies were 75.6%, 77.2%, 74.5% and 78.6% for CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage respectively. Staging accuracy with respect to threshold for neoadjuvant treatment showed 62.0% early tumours were correctly staged and 80.5% advanced tumours were correctly staged. Whether or not patients underwent EUS did not affect the staging accuracy with respect to neoadjuvant treatment threshold.ConclusionsStaging accuracy with respect to the threshold for treatment with neoadjuvant therapy is poor, leading to potential over/under treatment. Predicting individual response to neoadjuvant therapy would provide a better way to determine which patients should receive this additional treatment.
from Imaging via alkiviadis.1961 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2hBZ2cz
Σάββατο 18 Νοεμβρίου 2017
Loco-regional staging accuracy in oesophageal cancer—How good are we in the modern era?
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Purpose To test the effects of 4 weeks of unilateral low-load resistance training (LLRT), with and without blood flow restricti...
-
36 new pubmed citations were retrieved for your search. Click on the search hyperlink below to display the complete search results: quality...
-
The genital mucosa is a barrier that is constantly exposed to a variety of pathogens, allergens, and external stimuli. Although both allerge...
-
by Mark A. Valasek, Irene Thung, Esha Gollapalle, Alexey A. Hodkoff, Kaitlyn J. Kelly, Joel M. Baumgartner, Vera Vavinskaya, Grace Y. Lin, A...
-
The receptor tyrosine kinase KIT is an established oncogenic driver of tumor growth in certain tumor types, including gastrointestinal strom...
-
The main idea behind this work was demonstrated in a form of a new thermoelectrochromic sensor on a flexible substrate using graphene as an ...
-
Abstract There are limited published data on the burden of rare cancers in the United States. By using data from the North American Associ...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2f9YA71 via IFTTT
-
Relativistic hydrodynamics has been quite successful in explaining the collective behaviour of the QCD matter produced in high energy heavy-...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου