Publication date: Available online 23 November 2017
Source:Academic Radiology
Author(s): Zeeshaan S. Bhatti, Richard K.J. Brown, Ella A. Kazerooni, Matthew S. Davenport
Rationale and ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the preferences of radiology and referring provider residents regarding direct communication of radiology test results.MethodsThis Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant quality improvement effort was exempt from institutional review board oversight. An anonymous survey was emailed to 44 radiology residents and 364 referring resident providers who routinely provide or receive direct communication of test results at our quaternary care medical center. The survey focused on the frequency, indication, clinical utility, and methods of direct communication of radiology results. Proportions were compared to chi-square or Fisher exact test.ResultsThe response rates were 86% (37 of 43) (radiology) and 41% (151 of 364) (referring providers). Approximately half of radiology residents (49% [18 of 37]) thought the frequency of direct verbal communication was excessive, and none (0 of 37) thought more communication was needed. In contrast, only 1.3% (2 of 151; P < .001) of referring providers felt the frequency was excessive, and 24% (36 of 151; P < .001) desired more. The majority (66% [100 of 151]) of referring providers felt phone calls from radiologists often or always added value beyond a timely radiology report, and 59% (44 of 74) felt it is the radiologist's responsibility to call about abnormal findings. Furthermore, 83% (125 of 151) of referring providers preferred to receive a phone call about non-emergent unexpected findings, although preferences varied for various example abnormalities. For outpatients with non-emergent unexpected findings, most providers (90% [64 of 71]) prefer written communication rather than a phone call.ConclusionsReferring providers prefer direct communication of radiology results, even for non-urgent unexpected findings, whereas radiology residents prefer less direct communication and are more likely to consider radiologist-to-provider communication superfluous.
from Imaging via alkiviadis.1961 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2B6tfIn
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Publication date: Available online 4 January 2018 Source: European Journal of Radiology Author(s): Peiyao Zhang, Jing Wang, Qin Xu, Zhen...
-
Publication date: March 2017 Source: Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Volume 104 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfak...
-
Dtsch med Wochenschr DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-100054 Hintergrund und Fragestellung Ein etablierter Weg, die optimale Behandlung von Tumorpatien...
-
Background Hyperthyroidism is associated with increased thrombotic risk. As contact system activation through formation of neutrophil extrac...
-
Deepak Thapa, Vanita Ahuja, Deepanshu Dhiman Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2017 61(12):1012-1014 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexa...
-
Abstract Limited memory size is considered as a major bottleneck in data centers for intelligent urban computing. It is shown that there e...
-
ecancer is supporting #BowelCancerAwarenessMonth https://t.co/opXxCAAxzE from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inore...
-
Linked Article: Maintz et al. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:481–487 . from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader h...
-
Angelina Jolie’s openness about her diagnosis has undoubtedly raised public awareness of the importance of inherited cancers. Although Desai...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου