In the article titled “Negative and Positive Online Patient Reviews of Physicians—1 vs 5 Stars,” an incorrect type of online review cited has been corrected. In the Results section, “33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how honest the physician seemed to be” has been changed to “33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how knowledgeable the physician seemed to be.” This article has been corrected online.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lvwsfE
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Publication date: Available online 4 January 2018 Source: European Journal of Radiology Author(s): Peiyao Zhang, Jing Wang, Qin Xu, Zhen...
-
Background Hyperthyroidism is associated with increased thrombotic risk. As contact system activation through formation of neutrophil extrac...
-
Dtsch med Wochenschr DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-100054 Hintergrund und Fragestellung Ein etablierter Weg, die optimale Behandlung von Tumorpatien...
-
Publication date: March 2017 Source: Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Volume 104 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfak...
-
Related Articles Anatomic parameters of the sacral lamina for osteosynthesis in transverse sacral fractures. Surg Radiol Anat....
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5... Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5... Heralding change: The evolution ...
-
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dengue is a common arboviral disease, which uncommonly involves the brain. There has been a recent surge in dengu...
-
Purpose. We present a case of a patient with Soemmering ring after cataract surgery and a potential complication that can arise as a result ...
-
Abstract Purpose Investigate in patients with metastatic and/or irresectable colorectal cancer treated with systemic treatment with cape...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου