In the article titled “Negative and Positive Online Patient Reviews of Physicians—1 vs 5 Stars,” an incorrect type of online review cited has been corrected. In the Results section, “33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how honest the physician seemed to be” has been changed to “33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how knowledgeable the physician seemed to be.” This article has been corrected online.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lvwsfE
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objective Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) provides opportunities for improved cost savings, but in the UK, implementation...
-
Abstract Purpose Overcoming the flaws of current data management conditions in head and neck oncology could enable integrated informatio...
-
CBN News Cancer Took Most of His Tongue, but This Pastor Is Still Singing ... CBN News A youth pastor in San Diego, California is not ...
-
Related Articles Audiologic and radiologic findings in cochlear hypoplasia. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Jan 10;: Authors: Cinar BC, Bat...
-
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in many countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resu...
-
IJMS, Vol. 19, Pages 38: Recombinant Zika NS1 Protein Secreted from Vero Cells Is Efficient for Inducing Production of Immune Serum Directed...
-
Background. Globally 3 to 8% of reproductive age women are suffering from premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Several mental and reprodu...
-
Objectives Adult sagittal posture is established during childhood and adolescence. A flattened or hypercurved spine is associated with poore...
-
http://ift.tt/2tjuDUV
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου