The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual fifth edition (DSM-5) provides new criteria for delirium diagnosis. We examined delirium diagnosis using these new criteria compared with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual fourth edition (DSM-IV) in a large dataset of patients assessed for delirium and related presentations.; Patient data (n = 768) from six prospectively collected cohorts, clinically assessed using DSM-IV and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98), were pooled. Post hoc application of DRS-R98 item scores were used to rate DSM-5 criteria. 'Strict' and 'relaxed' DSM-5 criteria to ascertain delirium were compared to rates determined by DSM-IV.; Using DSM-IV by clinical assessment, delirium was found in 510/768 patients (66%). Strict DSM-5 criteria categorized 158 as delirious including 155 (30%) with DSM-IV delirium, whereas relaxed DSM-5 criteria identified 466 as delirious, including 455 (89%) diagnosed by DSM-IV (P <0.001). The concordance between the different diagnostic methods was: 53% (ĸ = 0.22) between DSM-IV and the strict DSM-5, 91% (ĸ = 0.82) between the DSM-IV and relaxed DSM-5 criteria and 60% (ĸ = 0.29) between the strict versus relaxed DSM-5 criteria. Only 155 cases were identified as delirium by all three approaches. The 55 (11%) patients with DSM-IV delirium who were not rated as delirious by relaxed criteria had lower mean DRS-R98 total scores than those rated as delirious (13.7 ± 3.9 versus 23.7 ± 6.0; P <0.001). Conversely, mean DRS-R98 score (21.1 ± 6.4) for the 70% not rated as delirious by strict DSM-5 criteria was consistent with suggested cutoff scores for full syndromal delirium. Only 11 cases met DSM-5 criteria that were not deemed to have DSM-IV delirium.; The concordance between DSM-IV and the new DSM-5 delirium criteria varies considerably depending on the interpretation of criteria. Overly-strict adherence for some new text details in DSM-5 criteria would reduce the number of delirium cases diagnosed; however, a more 'relaxed' approach renders DSM-5 criteria comparable to DSM-IV with minimal impact on their actual application and is thus recommended.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AHJwXT
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Recent updating of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in 2016 demonstrates...
-
In our previous work, the dichloromethane-methanol (1:1 v/v) extract, fractions and isolated compounds from Polyscias fulva stem bark showed...
-
Background Agricultural work can expose workers to increased risk of heat strain and volume depletion due to repeated exposures to high ambi...
-
Cincinnati.com No fooling; go get your head (and neck) examined for free Cincinnati.com Thursday, get your head examined. UC Health ...
-
Nursing students' perceptions of a video-based serious game's educational value: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Dec 28;...
-
Anaphora is a rhetorical term for the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or verses. from #AlexandrosSfa...
-
Abstract We introduce a novel diagnostic Visual Voiding Device (VVD), which has the ability to visually document urinary voiding events an...
-
Method combines radiomics with three - compartment breast image analysis of dual - energy mammography (Source: The Doctors Lounge - Oncology...
-
Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) has been widely used in dental implanting. However, the local hospitals usually don’t have access t...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου