Publication date: January 2018
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 88
Author(s): Stephen W. Duffy, Oliver W.E. Morrish, Prue C. Allgood, Richard Black, Maureen G.C. Gillan, Paula Willsher, Julie Cooke, Karen A. Duncan, Michael J. Michell, Hilary M. Dobson, Roberta Maroni, Yit Y. Lim, Hema N. Purushothaman, Tamara Suaris, Susan M. Astley, Kenneth C. Young, Lorraine Tucker, Fiona J. Gilbert
BackgroundMammographic density has been shown to be a strong independent predictor of breast cancer and a causative factor in reducing the sensitivity of mammography. There remain questions as to the use of mammographic density information in the context of screening and risk management, and of the association with cancer in populations known to be at increased risk of breast cancer.AimTo assess the association of breast density with presence of cancer by measuring mammographic density visually as a percentage, and with two automated volumetric methods, Quantra™ and VolparaDensity™.MethodsThe TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY (TOMMY) study of digital breast tomosynthesis in the Breast Screening Programme of the National Health Service (NHS) of the United Kingdom (UK) included 6020 breast screening assessment cases (of whom 1158 had breast cancer) and 1040 screened women with a family history of breast cancer (of whom two had breast cancer). We assessed the association of each measure with breast cancer risk in these populations at enhanced risk, using logistic regression adjusted for age and total breast volume as a surrogate for body mass index (BMI).ResultsAll density measures showed a positive association with presence of cancer and all declined with age. The strongest effect was seen with Volpara absolute density, with a significant 3% (95% CI 1–5%) increase in risk per 10 cm3 of dense tissue. The effect of Volpara volumetric density on risk was stronger for large and grade 3 tumours.ConclusionsAutomated absolute breast density is a predictor of breast cancer risk in populations at enhanced risk due to either positive mammographic findings or family history. In the screening context, density could be a trigger for more intensive imaging.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2i9C54j
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Publication date: Available online 4 January 2018 Source: European Journal of Radiology Author(s): Peiyao Zhang, Jing Wang, Qin Xu, Zhen...
-
Related Articles Anatomic parameters of the sacral lamina for osteosynthesis in transverse sacral fractures. Surg Radiol Anat....
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5... Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5... Heralding change: The evolution ...
-
Background Hyperthyroidism is associated with increased thrombotic risk. As contact system activation through formation of neutrophil extrac...
-
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dengue is a common arboviral disease, which uncommonly involves the brain. There has been a recent surge in dengu...
-
Abstract Purpose Investigate in patients with metastatic and/or irresectable colorectal cancer treated with systemic treatment with cape...
-
Publication date: January 2017 Source: The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Volume 52, Issue 1 Author(s): Patricia Michelle Troxell Klingen...
-
In rural Kenya, traditional and faith healers provide an alternative pathway to health care, including mental health care. However, not much...
-
2016-12-10T02-17-59Z Source: Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research R. Santosh Kumar*, T. Naga Satya Yagnesh. Solid dispersio...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου