Publication date: Available online 6 November 2017
Source:Journal of Dairy Science
Author(s): S. Eriksson, E. Jonas, L. Rydhmer, H. Röcklinsberg
The hot topic of genetic modification and genome editing is sometimes presented as a rapid solution to various problems in the field of animal breeding and genetics. These technologies hold potential for future use in agriculture but we need to be aware of difficulties in large-scale application and integration in breeding schemes. In this review, we discuss applications of both classical genetic modifications (GM) using vectors and genome editing in dairy cattle breeding. We use an interdisciplinary approach considering both ethical and animal breeding perspectives. Decisions on how to make use of these techniques need to be made based not only on what is possible, but on what is reasonable to do. Principles of animal integrity, naturalness, risk perception, and animal welfare issues are examples of ethically relevant factors to consider. These factors also influence public perception and decisions about regulations by authorities. We need to acknowledge that we lack complete understanding of the genetic background of complex traits. It may be difficult, therefore, to predict the full effect of certain modifications in large-scale breeding programs. We present 2 potential applications: genome editing to dispense with dehorning, and insertion of human genes in bovine genomes to improve udder health as an example of classical GM. Both of these cases could be seen as beneficial for animal welfare but they differ in other aspects. In the former case, a genetic variant already present within the species is introduced, whereas in the latter case, transgenic animals are generated—this difference may influence how society regards the applications. We underline that the use of GM, as well as genome editing, of farm animals such as cattle is not independent of the context, and should be considered as part of an entire process, including, for example, the assisted reproduction technology that needs to be used. We propose that breeding organizations and breeding companies should take an active role in ethical discussions about the use of these techniques and thereby signal to society that these questions are being responsibly addressed.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AfdSgn
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Hedgehog signalling pathway orchestrates angiogenesis in triple-negative breast cancers British Journal of Cancer 116, 1425 (23 May 2017). ...
-
Objective A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and/or electronic n...
-
Publication date: April 2017 Source: European Journal of Cancer, Volume 75 Author(s): A. Ieni, G. Angelico, P. Zeppa, G. Tuccari fro...
-
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Feasibility of brain atrophy measurement in patients with MS in clinical routine, without prior standardization o...
-
Abstract Currently, the use of nanotechnologies is in rapid expansion, which entails increasing risks of environmental contamination by na...
-
Summary Geographic information systems (GIS) data/methods offer good promise for public health programs including obesity-related research...
-
The Women in Neurotology (WIN)—A Cross-sectional Survey No abstract available Hearing Protection, Restoration, and Regeneration: An Overview...
-
Abstract Abnormal accumulation of alpha-synuclein (αsyn) is a pathological hallmark of Lewy body related disorders such as Parkinson's...
-
IJMS, Vol. 19, Pages 570: Alteration of Epigenetic Regulation by Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer International Journal of Molecular Sciences ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου