Publication date: Available online 6 November 2017
Source:Journal of Dairy Science
Author(s): S. Eriksson, E. Jonas, L. Rydhmer, H. Röcklinsberg
The hot topic of genetic modification and genome editing is sometimes presented as a rapid solution to various problems in the field of animal breeding and genetics. These technologies hold potential for future use in agriculture but we need to be aware of difficulties in large-scale application and integration in breeding schemes. In this review, we discuss applications of both classical genetic modifications (GM) using vectors and genome editing in dairy cattle breeding. We use an interdisciplinary approach considering both ethical and animal breeding perspectives. Decisions on how to make use of these techniques need to be made based not only on what is possible, but on what is reasonable to do. Principles of animal integrity, naturalness, risk perception, and animal welfare issues are examples of ethically relevant factors to consider. These factors also influence public perception and decisions about regulations by authorities. We need to acknowledge that we lack complete understanding of the genetic background of complex traits. It may be difficult, therefore, to predict the full effect of certain modifications in large-scale breeding programs. We present 2 potential applications: genome editing to dispense with dehorning, and insertion of human genes in bovine genomes to improve udder health as an example of classical GM. Both of these cases could be seen as beneficial for animal welfare but they differ in other aspects. In the former case, a genetic variant already present within the species is introduced, whereas in the latter case, transgenic animals are generated—this difference may influence how society regards the applications. We underline that the use of GM, as well as genome editing, of farm animals such as cattle is not independent of the context, and should be considered as part of an entire process, including, for example, the assisted reproduction technology that needs to be used. We propose that breeding organizations and breeding companies should take an active role in ethical discussions about the use of these techniques and thereby signal to society that these questions are being responsibly addressed.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AfdSgn
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Recent updating of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in 2016 demonstrates...
-
In our previous work, the dichloromethane-methanol (1:1 v/v) extract, fractions and isolated compounds from Polyscias fulva stem bark showed...
-
Cincinnati.com No fooling; go get your head (and neck) examined for free Cincinnati.com Thursday, get your head examined. UC Health ...
-
Background Agricultural work can expose workers to increased risk of heat strain and volume depletion due to repeated exposures to high ambi...
-
Nursing students' perceptions of a video-based serious game's educational value: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Dec 28;...
-
Anaphora is a rhetorical term for the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or verses. from #AlexandrosSfa...
-
Abstract We introduce a novel diagnostic Visual Voiding Device (VVD), which has the ability to visually document urinary voiding events an...
-
Method combines radiomics with three - compartment breast image analysis of dual - energy mammography (Source: The Doctors Lounge - Oncology...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου