We much appreciated for the comment on our manuscript[1]. However, there are some misunderstanding in this comment. Firstly, the authors concluded that circPVT1 played a cancer suppressor role in vivo (from the clinical correlation), while was proved to act an oncogene in vitro (from the functional assays). However, the clinical correlation (biomarker) may have no functional implication. We were also very curious about the contradiction between clinical implication and cellular function of circPVT1 in GC.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2sc4kQ2
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Nursing students' perceptions of a video-based serious game's educational value: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Dec 28;...
-
In our previous work, the dichloromethane-methanol (1:1 v/v) extract, fractions and isolated compounds from Polyscias fulva stem bark showed...
-
Anaphora is a rhetorical term for the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or verses. from #AlexandrosSfa...
-
Cincinnati.com No fooling; go get your head (and neck) examined for free Cincinnati.com Thursday, get your head examined. UC Health ...
-
Background Agricultural work can expose workers to increased risk of heat strain and volume depletion due to repeated exposures to high ambi...
-
Abstract Recent updating of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in 2016 demonstrates...
-
Abstract We introduce a novel diagnostic Visual Voiding Device (VVD), which has the ability to visually document urinary voiding events an...
-
San Francisco Chronicle Inside an SF 'death trap' where nearly two dozen people lived San Francisco Chronicle Soto needed wa...
-
People use alcohol for numerous reasons; peer pressure, celebration, anxiety, sadness, boredom, rebellion and insomnia are just a few. Teens...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου