We much appreciated for the comment on our manuscript[1]. However, there are some misunderstanding in this comment. Firstly, the authors concluded that circPVT1 played a cancer suppressor role in vivo (from the clinical correlation), while was proved to act an oncogene in vitro (from the functional assays). However, the clinical correlation (biomarker) may have no functional implication. We were also very curious about the contradiction between clinical implication and cellular function of circPVT1 in GC.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2sc4kQ2
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
You know the feeling: you're hanging out somewhere, you look across the room, and suddenly your stomach drops. You start to sweat. Your ...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2o7K1Dm via IFTTT
-
What is now Middlesex University was originally a vision for a People's University: A polytechnic that would unite science, society and ...
-
University of sydney essay writing guide - professional writers, top-notch services, instant delivery and other advantages can be found in o...
-
Zusammenfassung Klinisches/methodisches Problem Akquisitionen in der Computertomographie (CT) sollten immer nach dem ALARA-Prinzip („as ...
-
We Are a Leadership Development Company. Harvard Business Publishing Corporate Learning partners with clients to create world-class leadersh...
-
About IRF. The Incentive Research Foundation (IRF), a private not-for-profit foundation, funds research studies and develops products servin...
-
Inflatable Penile Prosthesis | Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implant Surgery with Penis Enlargement Phalloplasty from #AlexandrosSfakianakis...
-
Unit 5: Writing cohesively - Section index. This unit looks at the use of language strategies to create clear, cohesive writing. It shows yo...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου