Compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) planning, three-dimensional (3D) planning in orthognathic surgery yields more accurate anatomical information and enables the precise positioning of maxillary and mandibular segments, particularly for patients with facial asymmetry. Accordingly, surgical outcomes achieved using 3D planning should be superior. This study determined the differences between the 2D and 3D planning techniques by comparing their surgical outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2pRr2yp
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Publication date: Available online 4 January 2018 Source: European Journal of Radiology Author(s): Peiyao Zhang, Jing Wang, Qin Xu, Zhen...
-
Publication date: March 2017 Source: Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Volume 104 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfak...
-
Dtsch med Wochenschr DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-100054 Hintergrund und Fragestellung Ein etablierter Weg, die optimale Behandlung von Tumorpatien...
-
Background Hyperthyroidism is associated with increased thrombotic risk. As contact system activation through formation of neutrophil extrac...
-
Deepak Thapa, Vanita Ahuja, Deepanshu Dhiman Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2017 61(12):1012-1014 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexa...
-
Abstract Limited memory size is considered as a major bottleneck in data centers for intelligent urban computing. It is shown that there e...
-
ecancer is supporting #BowelCancerAwarenessMonth https://t.co/opXxCAAxzE from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inore...
-
Linked Article: Maintz et al. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:481–487 . from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader h...
-
Angelina Jolie’s openness about her diagnosis has undoubtedly raised public awareness of the importance of inherited cancers. Although Desai...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου