Publication date: Available online 23 April 2017
Source:Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Author(s): Nima Khavanin, Cecil S. Qiu, Alexei S. Mlodinow, Michael M. Vu, Robert G. Dorfman, Neil A. Fine, John Y.S. Kim
IntroductionThe Breast reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) Score estimates patient-specific risk for post-surgical complications using an individual's unique combination of pre-operative variables. In this report, we externally validate the BRA Score models for surgical site infection, seroma, and explantation in a large sample of intra-institutional patients who underwent prosthetic breast reconstruction.MethodsWe reviewed all initiated tissue expander/implant reconstructions by the senior authors from January 2004 to December 2015. BRA Score risk estimates were computed for each patient and compared against observed rates of complications. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, concordance statistic, and Brier score were used to assess the calibration, discrimination, and accuracy of the models, respectively.ResultsOf the 1,152 patients (1743 breasts) reviewed, 855 patients (1333 breasts) had complete data for BRA-score calculations and were included for analysis. Hosmer-Lemeshow tests for calibration demonstrated good agreement between observed and predicted outcomes for surgical site infection (SSI) and seroma models (P-values of 0.33 and 0.16, respectively). In contrast, predicted rates of explantation deviated from observed rates (Hosmer-Lemeshow P-value of 0.04). C statistics demonstrated good discrimination for SSI, seroma, and explantation (0.73, 0.69, 0.78, respectively).ConclusionsIn this external validation study, the BRA Score tissue expander/implant reconstruction models performed with generally good calibration, discrimination, and accuracy. Some weaknesses in certain models were identified as targets for future improvement. Taken together, these analyses validate the clinical utility of the BRA score risk models in predicting 30-day outcomes.
http://ift.tt/2p5Ljhe
Κυριακή 23 Απριλίου 2017
External Validation of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Calculator
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Recent updating of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in 2016 demonstrates...
-
In our previous work, the dichloromethane-methanol (1:1 v/v) extract, fractions and isolated compounds from Polyscias fulva stem bark showed...
-
Anaphora is a rhetorical term for the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or verses. from #AlexandrosSfa...
-
Abstract We introduce a novel diagnostic Visual Voiding Device (VVD), which has the ability to visually document urinary voiding events an...
-
Nursing students' perceptions of a video-based serious game's educational value: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Dec 28;...
-
Background Agricultural work can expose workers to increased risk of heat strain and volume depletion due to repeated exposures to high ambi...
-
Cincinnati.com No fooling; go get your head (and neck) examined for free Cincinnati.com Thursday, get your head examined. UC Health ...
-
There are various ways of creating an essay writing company. Our writing company was established by a team of skillful writers who wanted to...
-
After being taken down twice by Blogger within a single week, we got the message: It’s Time To Go. Gates of Vienna has moved to a new addres...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου