Publication date: Available online 27 February 2017
Source:Clinical Biochemistry
Author(s): Davide Giavarina, Giuseppe Lippi
The extra-analytical phases of the total testing process have substantial impact on managed care, as well as an inherent high risk of vulnerability to errors which is often greater than that of the analytical phase. The collection of biological samples is a crucial preanalytical activity. Problems or errors occurring shortly before, or soon after, this preanalytical step may impair sample quality and characteristics, or else modify the final results of testing.The standardization of fasting requirements, rest, patient position and psychological state of the patient are therefore crucial for mitigating the impact of preanalytical variability. Moreover, the quality of materials used for collecting specimens, along with their compatibility, can guarantee sample quality and persistence of chemical and physical characteristics of the analytes over time, so safeguarding the reliability of testing. Appropriate techniques and sampling procedures are effective to prevent problems such as hemolysis, undue clotting in the blood tube, draw of insufficient sample volume and modification of analyte concentration. An accurate identification of both patient and blood samples is a key priority as for other healthcare activities. Good laboratory practice and appropriate training of operators, by specifically targeting collection of biological samples, blood in particular, may greatly improve this issue, thus lowering the risk of errors and their adverse clinical consequences.The implementation of a simple and rapid check-list, including verification of blood collection devices, patient preparation and sampling techniques, was found to be effective for enhancing sample quality and reducing some preanalytical errors associated with these procedures. The use of this tool, along with implementation of objective and standardized systems for detecting non-conformities related to unsuitable samples, can be helpful for standardizing preanalytical activities and improving the quality of laboratory diagnostics, ultimately helping to reaffirm a “preanalytical” culture founded on knowledge and real risk perception.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2mo2JHd
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Recent updating of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in 2016 demonstrates...
-
In our previous work, the dichloromethane-methanol (1:1 v/v) extract, fractions and isolated compounds from Polyscias fulva stem bark showed...
-
Background Agricultural work can expose workers to increased risk of heat strain and volume depletion due to repeated exposures to high ambi...
-
Cincinnati.com No fooling; go get your head (and neck) examined for free Cincinnati.com Thursday, get your head examined. UC Health ...
-
Nursing students' perceptions of a video-based serious game's educational value: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Dec 28;...
-
Anaphora is a rhetorical term for the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses or verses. from #AlexandrosSfa...
-
Abstract We introduce a novel diagnostic Visual Voiding Device (VVD), which has the ability to visually document urinary voiding events an...
-
Method combines radiomics with three - compartment breast image analysis of dual - energy mammography (Source: The Doctors Lounge - Oncology...
-
Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) has been widely used in dental implanting. However, the local hospitals usually don’t have access t...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου