Di Mario et al1 make an extremely important point about the nuances of infant feeding guidelines and the continued confusion that will result if we are not judicious in our interpretation of the science at hand.2 They argue that care should be taken to ensure precise descriptions of the outcomes of studies so that recommendations can be clear and consistent. In the case of infant feeding, this means interpreting the Learning Early About Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study results on the basis of design and findings of the trial.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2kbQ7ky
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
As demonstrated by the market reactions to downgrades of various sovereign credit ratings in 2011, the credit rating agencies occupy an impo...
-
Lichtenstein intervention is currently the classic model of the regulated treatment of inguinal hernias by direct local approach. This “tens...
-
Abstract Kenaf is a multipurpose crop, but a lack of genetic information hinders genetic and molecular research. In this study, we aimed t...
-
Spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma is an uncommonly encountered benign neoplasm that is usually found in the subcutaneous tissues. Rare cases r...
-
ORIGINAL ARTICLES Cyclooxygenase-2 and estrogen receptor-β as possible therapeutic targets in desmoid tumors p. 47 Rasha A Khairy DOI :10....
-
Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them Cystic echinococcosis in unaccompanied minor refugees from Afghanistan and the Middle E...
-
Abstract In recent years, global reanalysis weather data has been widely used in hydrological modeling around the world, but the results of...
-
New magnetic resonance (MR) molecular imaging techniques offer the potential for non-invasive, simultaneous quantification of metabolic and ...
-
The parotid gland harbors 85% of all salivary gland neoplasms. Though the majority of tumors are benign, complete surgical resection remains...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου