Di Mario et al1 make an extremely important point about the nuances of infant feeding guidelines and the continued confusion that will result if we are not judicious in our interpretation of the science at hand.2 They argue that care should be taken to ensure precise descriptions of the outcomes of studies so that recommendations can be clear and consistent. In the case of infant feeding, this means interpreting the Learning Early About Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study results on the basis of design and findings of the trial.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2kbQ7ky
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objectives Greece is one of the leading tobacco-producing countries in European Union, and every year over 19 000 Greeks die from tobacco-at...
-
Objectives Drug interactions, poor adherence to medication and high-risk sexual behaviour may occur in individuals with HIV using recreation...
-
Abstract Background Mature T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell lymphomas compose a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and ext...
-
Objective To describe the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and sight-threatening DR (STDR) among Chinese adults with dia...
-
Introduction Multimorbidity (MM) refers to the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions within one person, where no one condition is co...
-
Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission is known to occur through direct contact with infected blood. There has been some suspicion ...
-
In Rwanda, the prevalence of viral hepatitis (HCV) is poorly understood. The current study investigated the prevalence and risk factors of H...
-
Related Articles Three job stress models and their relationship with musculoskeletal pain in blue- and white-collar workers. J Psycho...
-
Background The health hazards associated with the use of smokeless tobacco (SLT) are similar to those of smoking. However, unlike smoking, l...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου