An Alternative Posterosuperior Auricular Fascia Flap for Ear Elevation During Microtia Reconstruction

Abstract

Background

Advances in staged total auricular reconstruction have resulted in improved anterior auricular appearance; however, satisfactory postreconstruction esthetics of the retroauricular fold remain challenging. The postauricular appearance of the reconstructed ear depends largely upon optimizing the covering material. When used as the covering soft tissue for ear elevation, a flap containing primarily the upper portion of the retroauricular fascia has potential advantages over the conventional book cover-type retroauricular fascia flap.

Methods

We developed a geometrically designed, posterosuperior auricular fascia flap to replace the conventional retroauricular fascia flap for ear elevation. During the second-stage operation, the posterosuperior auricular fascia flap is rotated downward and turned over to wrap around the inner strut and entire posterior auricular surface.

Results

Compared to the conventional book cover-type retroauricular fascia flap, the novel posterosuperior auricular fascia flap was easier to harvest and the operative time significantly decreased (110.3 vs. 121.5 min, p < 0.01). The modified flap produced a thin and natural contour of the postauricular surface, as well as reduced the incidence of postauricular hypertrophic scarring (from 24.7 to 13.2%, p = 0.03) and partial skin graft necrosis (from 43.4 to 31.2%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The geometrically designed posterosuperior auricular fascia flap improves ear elevation. Compared to the conventional book cover-type retroauricular fascia flap, this covering tissue is easier to perform so the surgical time is decreased. It was highly vascularized, well defined, thinner, and yields reliable results. Thus, favorable postauricular surface results can be achieved during auricular reconstruction by using the modified fascia flap.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://ift.tt/18t7xNj

from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2ib0Ri5
via IFTTT