The authors regret that in this article (Cancer Lett. 2005 Aug 8; 226(1): 77–84.), which was published on Aug, 2005, issue of Cancer Letter. 2005, 226, the immunohistochemical staining presented in Fig. 1, specifically (A) and (C) are incorrect. The authors have provided a new version of Fig. 1 (below). The conclusions set forth in the article remain unchanged.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2ipt3vq
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
New analysis shows that some of these amazing flying beasts were far more formidable than we'd ever thought before... -- Read more on...
-
Do you speak NHS?Oh, yes: you don’t get far in the health service without being able to generate a seamless flow of the right words, if only...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2oDLxf6 via IFTTT
-
The government has announced its intention to make sex and relationships education (SRE) statutory in all secondary schools, and to make rel...
-
Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a telehealthcare application for operable lung cancer (OLC) patie...
-
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co Cancer Drug Cost Comes Under Fire In U.K. StockNews.com (blog) NICE noted the evidence that nivolumab can ext...
-
Abstract Background Medical therapy efficacy remains controversial in stricturing Crohn's disease. Cross-sectional imaging, especial...
-
Abstract The applicability of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) using a single-stage thermal modulator was explored...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2o3hqws via IFTTT
-
Abstract Patients with sulfite oxidase (SO) deficiency present severe brain abnormalities, whose pathophysiology is not yet elucidated. We...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου