Τετάρτη 23 Νοεμβρίου 2022

Subjective and objective evaluation of masticatory function in patients with bimaxillary implant‐supported prostheses

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Background

People perform poorly in masticatory function tests despite well-functioning prostheses. However, it is unclear whether there is an agreement between subjective and objective measures of mastication.

Objectives

To investigate the association between subjective and objective measures of masticatory function in patients with bimaxillary implant-supported prostheses.

Materials and methods

An experimental group (n=25, age=70.6 ±7.5 years, 8 women) with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed prostheses and a control group (n=25, age=69.0 ±5.3, 13 women) with natural dentition were recruited. The participants in the experimental group were included if they had been using the prosthesis for at least a year and had no obvious complaints with their prostheses. The control group was people with natural dentition and without any prostheses or complaints related to the masticatory system. The masticatory function was evaluated objectively with food comminution and mixing ability tests, and subjectively with jaw function limitation scale (JLFS) and oral health impact profile (OHIP).

Results

The experimental group performed poorly in both objective tests (P<.001). However, there was no significant differences between the two groups in total JFLS (P=0.114) and OHIP (P=0.312) scores. Though, there were certain positive correlations between the food comminution test and JFLS subdomains in the control group, and a positive correlation between food comminution test and specific subdomains of OHIP in the experimental group indicating poor correlation between the subjective and objective measures.

Conclusion

Although patients with implant prostheses show poor masticatory performance, there is no agreement in the objective and subjective measures of mastication.
View on Web
Αναρτήθηκε από στις Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Preoperative Computed Tomography Radiomics Analysis for Predicting Receptors Status and Ki-67 Levels in Breast Cancer

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageBackground: To assess the prediction performance of preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) based radiomics features for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2+), and Ki-67 status of breast cancer. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 108 breast cancer patients who received preoperative chest CT examinations in our institution from July 2018 to January 2020. Radiomics features were separately extracted from nonenhanced, arterial, and portal-venous phases CT images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used for feature selection. Then the radiomics signatures for each phase and a combined model of 3 phases were built. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration curves were used to confirm the performance of the radiomics signatures and combined model. In addition, the decision curves were performed to estimate the clinical usefulness of the combined model. Results: The 20 most predictive features were finally selected to build radiomics signatures for each phase. The combined model achieved the overall best performance than using either of the nonenhanced, arterial and portal-venous phases alone, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.870 for ER+ versus ER−, 0.797 for PR+ versus PR−, 0.881 for HER2+ versus HER2−, and 0.726 for Ki-67. The decision curve demonstrated that the CT-based radiomics features were clinically useful. Conclusion: This study indicated preopreative chest CT radiomics analysis might be able to assess ER, PR, HER2+, and Ki-67 status of breast cancer. The findings need further to be verified in future larger studies.
View on Web
Αναρτήθηκε από στις Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Identifying vulnerable populations with symptomatic cholelithiasis at risk for increased health care utilization

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageBACKGROUND Gallstones are a common problem in the United States with many patients suffering from symptomatic cholelithiasis (SC). Patients with SC may first present to the emergency department ED) and are often discharged for elective follow-up; however, it is unknown what system and patient factors are associated with increased risk for ED revisits. This study aimed to assess longitudinal ED utilization and cholecystectomy for patients with SC and identify patient, geographic, and hospital characteristics associated with ED revisits, specifically race/ethnicity and insurance status. METHODS Patients discharged from the ED with SC between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were identified from California administrative databases and followed for 1 year. Emergency department revisits and cholecystectomy after discharge were examined using logistic regression, clustering standard errors by hospital. Models adjusted for patient, geographic, and hospital variables using census and hospital administrative data. RESULTS Cohort included 34,427 patients who presented to the ED with SC and were discharged. There were 18.8% of the patients that had one or more biliary-related ED revisits within 1 year. In fully adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher odds for any ED revisit (adjusted odds ratio 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.39) and for two more ED revisits (adjusted odds ratio 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–1.82). Insurance type was also associated with ED revisits. CONCLUSION Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced higher utilization of health care resources for SC after adjusting for other patient, geographic and hospital variables. Strategies to mitigate these disparities may include the development of standardized protocols regarding the follow-up and education for SC. Implementation of such strategies can ensure equitable treatment for all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.
View on Web
Αναρτήθηκε από στις Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Redefining the costal margin: A pilot study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageBACKGROUND Classical teaching of rib anatomy contends that the false ribs (7th to 10th) fuse anteriorly to form the costal margin of the chest. Slipped rib syndrome consists of false rib subluxation into the thorax with symptomatic impingement of the intercostal nerve. We sought to determine the incidence of this anatomic finding through anatomic study of the costal margin. METHODS Cadavers were evaluated for mobility and attachment of the ninth and tenth ribs. Experienced anatomists and chest wall surgeons conducted a standardized dissection and assessed rib tip mobility using predefined criteria. Videos of dissections were submitted to a single investigator who reviewed the findings. RESULTS Costal margins of 40 cadavers (45% male) were evaluated bilaterally. The average age was 83 years ± 11 years. The ninth rib was found to be attached to the eighth rib 100% of the time by an interchondral cartilaginous attachment along the body of the eighth and ninth ribs. Internal subluxation was noted in 19% (15 of 80), and the tip of the rib was mobile in 86% (69 of 80) evaluations. The tenth rib was attached to the ninth rib in 18%(14/80). A "floating" 10th rib was noted in 59% (47 of 80) of specimens. Subluxation was noted in 33% (26 of 60). Half of the ribs that subluxed moved medially to the ninth rib and half moved externally. An upwardly hooked tip was noted in 10% (8 of 80). Ribs with a hooked tip subluxed in 63% (5 of 8), and all of these ribs (5 of 5) moved to the interior of the chest (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION The ninth rib is commonly attached to the eighth rib, but the tenth rib is often not attached to the ninth rib. Most commonly, the tenth rib is a "floating" rib. Internal subluxation of the tenth rib as well as the presence of a hooked tip may predispose individuals to the development of "slipped rib syndrome." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.
View on Web
Αναρτήθηκε από στις Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

A method for identifying the learning curve for the surgical stabilization of rib fractures

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageBACKGROUND Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is an accepted efficacious treatment modality for patients with severe chest wall injuries. Despite increased adoption of SSRF, surgical learning curves are unknown. We hypothesized intraoperative duration could define individual SSRF learning curves. METHODS Consecutive SSRF operations between January 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. Operative time, as measured from incision until skin closure, was evaluated by cumulative sum methodology using a range of acceptable "missteps" to determine the learning curves. Misstep was defined by extrapolation of accumulated operative time data. RESULTS Eighty-three patients underwent SSRF by three surgeons during this retrospective review. Average operative times ranged from 135 minutes for two plates to 247 minutes for seven plates. Using polynomial regression of average operative times, 75 minutes for general procedural requirements plus 35 minutes per plate were derived as the anticipated operative times per procedure. Cumulative sum analyses using 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% incident rates for not meeting expected operative times, or "missteps" were used. An institutional learning curve between 15 and 55 SSRF operations was identified assuming a 90% performance rate. An individual learning curve of 15 to 20 operations assuming a 90% performance rate was observed. After this period, operative times stabilized or decreased for surgeons A, B, and C. CONCLUSION The institutional and individual surgeon learning curves for SSRF appears to steadily improve after 15 to 20 operations using operative time as a surrogate for performance. The implementation of SSRF programs by trauma/acute care surgeons is feasible with an attainable learning curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
View on Web
Αναρτήθηκε από στις Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures versus nonoperative treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An international, retrospective matched case-control study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
imageBACKGROUND The presence of six or more rib fractures or a displaced rib fracture due to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been associated with longer hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Evidence on the effect of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) following CPR is limited. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after SSRF versus nonoperative management in patients with multiple rib fractures after CPR. METHODS An international, retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent SSRF or nonoperative management for multiple rib fractures following CPR between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2020. Patients who underwent SSRF were matched to nonoperative controls by cardiac arrest location and cause, rib fracture pattern, and age. The primary outcome was ICU LOS. RESULTS Thirty-nine operatively treated patient were matched to 66 nonoperatively managed controls with comparable CPR-related characteristics. Patients who underwent SSRF more often had displaced rib fractures (n = 28 [72%] vs. n = 31 [47%]; p = 0.015) and a higher median number of displaced ribs (2 [P25–P75, 0–3] vs. 0 [P25–P75, 0–3]; p = 0.014). Surgical stabilization of rib fractures was performed at a median of 5 days (P25–P75, 3–8 days) after CPR. In the nonoperative group, a rib fixation specialist was consulted in 14 patients (21%). The ICU LOS was longer in the SSRF group (13 days [P25–P75, 9–23 days] vs. 9 days [P25–P75, 5–15 days]; p = 0.004). Mechanical ventilator-free days, hospital LOS, thoracic complications, and mortality were similar. CONCLUSION Despite matching, those who underwent SSRF over nonoperative management for multiple rib fractures following CPR had more severe consequential chest wall injury and a longer ICU LOS. A benefit of SSRF on in-hospital outcomes could not be demonstrated. A low consultation rate for rib fixation in the nonoperative group indicates that the consideration to perform SSRF in this population might be associated with other nonradiographic or injury-related variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
View on Web
Αναρτήθηκε από στις Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Εγγραφή σε: Αναρτήσεις (Atom)

Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις