Contemporary proponents of Confucian political philosophy often ignore the fact that any sizeable future Confucian political order will have to accommodate many “non-Confucians.” The guiding question of this paper is therefore the following: how could a Confucian political philosophy, if it can at all, adequately take into account a plurality of comprehensive worldviews? I first turn to John Rawls and his account of these terms and of reasonable pluralism more generally. I then examine some particularly relevant developments and criticism of Rawls’ account. Finally, I offer a discussion of some recent proposals for a Confucian political philosophy, and examine to what extent each recognizes the fact of pluralism, sees it as a challenge, and deals with it in a persuasive manner. The paper concludes with a depiction of two major stumbling blocks that might stand firmly in the way of such a pluralism-accommodating political Confucianism.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2yYkp25
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Excerpt from Common Culture: Reading and Writing About American Popular Culture. Ed. Michael Petracca, Madeleine Sorapure. Upper Saddle Rive...
-
Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance. Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):11-28 Authors: Haller S, Vernooij MW, Kuij...
-
Thesis Statement Creator: Directions: This web page explains the different parts to a thesis statement and helps you create your own. You ca...
-
Abstract Objectives Patients undergoing osteoporosis treatment benefit greatly from early detection. We previously developed a computer-...
-
Publication date: Available online 20 March 2018 Source: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Author(s): Tobia...
-
Related Articles Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;...
-
Related Articles Physician Dismissal of Families Who Refuse Vaccination: An Ethical Assessment. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(3):654-60 ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου