Publication date: February 2017
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 72
Author(s): Mark A. Applebaum, Zalman Vaksman, Sang Mee Lee, Eric A. Hungate, Tara O. Henderson, Wendy B. London, Navin Pinto, Samuel L. Volchenboum, Julie R. Park, Arlene Naranjo, Barbara Hero, Andrew D. Pearson, Barbara E. Stranger, Susan L. Cohn, Sharon J. Diskin
BackgroundThe incidence of second malignant neoplasm (SMN) within the first ten years of diagnosis in high-risk neuroblastoma patients treated with modern, intensive therapy is unknown. Further, the underlying germline genetics that contribute to SMN in these survivors are not known.MethodsThe International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) database of patients diagnosed from 1990 to 2010 was analysed. SMN risk was accessed by cumulative incidence, standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risk. A candidate gene-based association study evaluated genetic susceptibility to SMN in neuroblastoma survivors.ResultsOf the 5987 patients in the INRG database with SMN data enrolled in a clinical trial, 43 (0.72%) developed a SMN. The 10-year cumulative incidence of SMN for high-risk patients was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–2.6%) compared with 0.38% (95% CI: 0.22–0.94%) for low-risk patients (P = 0.01). High-risk patients had an almost 18-fold higher incidence of SMN compared to age- and sex-matched controls (SIR = 17.5 (95% CI: 11.4–25.3), absolute excess risk = 27.6). For patients treated on high- and intermediate-risk clinical trials, the SIR of acute myelogenous leukaemia was 106.8 (95% CI: 28.7–273.4) and 127.7 (95%CI: 25.7–373.3), respectively. Variants implicating DNA repair genes XRCC3 (rs861539: P = 0.006; odds ratio: 2.04, 95%CI: 1.19–3.46) and MSH2 (rs17036651: P = 0.009; odds ratio: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08–0.81) were associated with SMN.ConclusionThe intensive multi-modality treatment strategy currently used to treat high-risk neuroblastoma is associated with a significantly increased risk of secondary acute myelogenous leukaemia. Defining the interactions of treatment exposures and genetic factors that promote the development of SMN is critical for optimising survivorship care.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2izsM8a
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
RT @AnticancerOrgUK : New @Anticancerfund video on the potential of drug repurposing: https://t.co/inyOHYGF7p from #AlexandrosSfakianaki...
-
Is it feasible to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm that can actually... Read more on AuntMinnieEurope.com Related Reading: ...
-
Posttraumatic radioulnar synostosis (RUS) is a rare event following forearm fractures. Consequences are disabling for patients who suffer fr...
-
TO Abdurrazaq, AA Ibikunle, RO Braimah Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research 2016 6(4):251-256 Necrotizing fasciitis was recog...
-
Nature's designs are helping to build amazing new devices that link to the body and each other, reveals a fascinating book called Bioins...
-
Pneumoparotitis as a complication of long-term oronasal positive airway pressure for sleep apnea. Head Neck. 2017 Nov 17;: Authors: G...
-
Objectives Foundry work is a risk factor for lung cancer; however, the association with welding is unclear, as smoking is common among metal...
-
Elevated interstitial fluid pressure and solid stress within tumors contribute to poor intratumoral distribution of nanomedicine. In this st...
-
Security. Let's face it. Software has holes. And hackers love to exploit them. New vulnerabilities appear almost daily. If you have soft...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου