Weak silica nanomaterial-induced genotoxicity can be explained by indirect DNA damage as shown by the OGG1-modified comet assay and genomic analysis

<span class="paragraphSection"><div class="boxTitle">Abstract</div>In a previous study, 15-nm silica nanoparticles (NPs) caused small increases in DNA damage in liver as measured in the <span style="font-style:italic;">in vivo</span> comet and micronucleus assays after intravenous administration to rats at their maximum tolerated dose, a worst-case exposure scenario. Histopathological examination supported a particle-induced, tissue damage-mediated inflammatory response. This study used a targeted approach to provide insight into the mode of action (MoA) by examining transcriptional regulation of genes in liver in a time and dose-dependent manner at 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after intravenous administration of 15-nm silica NPs. DNA damage was assessed using the standard comet assay and hOGG1 glycosylase-modified comet assay that also measures oxidative DNA damage. Potassium bromate, an IARC Class 2B carcinogen that specifically operates via an oxidative stress MoA, was used as a positive control for the hOGG1 comet assay and gave a strong signal in its main target organ, the kidney, while showing less activity in liver. Treatment of rats with silica NPs at 50 mg/kg body weight (bw) caused small, statistically insignificant increases in DNA damage in liver measured by the standard comet assay, while a statistically significant increase was observed at 4 h with the hOGG1 comet assay, consistent with a MoA involving reactive oxygen species. Histopathology showed liver damage and neutrophil involvement while genomic analysis and response pattern of key genes involved in inflammation and oxidative stress supported a tissue damage-mediated inflammatory response involving the complement system for removing/phagocytising damaged cells. No changes were observed for histopathology or gene array for the low-dose (5 mg/kg bw) silica NPs. The results of this study confirm our hypothesis that the weak DNA damage observed by silica NPs occurs secondary to inflammation/immune response, indicating that a threshold can be applied in the risk assessment of these materials.</span>

from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2jKX3CP
via IFTTT