Publication date: 2018
Source:The Nature and Use of Ecotoxicological Evidence
Author(s): Michael C. Newman
Previous chapters focused narrowly on evidence generation, processing, and use by individuals. From this point onward, focus will shift to social cognition and co-decision-making by groups responsible for generating or applying evidence. Group decision-making might involve a pair of individuals, small groups with or without formal structure, large networks or groups defined by some common feature or objective, or spontaneously coalescing collections of widely dispersed individuals like those that emerge on the Internet. It might also involve expert panels that combine individual, expert–elicitor pair, and group decision-making features. This chapter examines the sociology giving rise to suboptimal behaviors in pairs or small groups of individuals, suggesting ways of reducing the likelihood of poor decision-making behaviors in groups of ecotoxicologists and risk assessors.
from Imaging via alkiviadis.1961 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2IidjXY
Δευτέρα 12 Μαρτίου 2018
Chapter 6 Social Processing of Evidence
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Business Cover Letter Writing. The business professional can include a fairly broad group, so make sure you that cold cover letters have a j...
-
Abstract Background Liver resection of benign, primary, and metastatic tumors is challenging and places patients at risk of postoperativ...
-
Writers use the descriptive essay to create a vivid picture of a person, place, or thing. Unlike a narrative essay, which reveals meaning th...
-
Radiomics in Head and Neck Cancer: Extracting Valuable Information from Data beyond Recognition. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 20...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nelNZ8 via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου