<span class="paragraphSection">The commentary brings up two topics. The first concerns whether and how a patient’s socioeconomic status (SES) should count in clinical care. We provide a brief summary of Puschel and colleagues’ view and discuss it in relation to other accounts. We share their conclusion; considering SES in clinical care can be justified from a fairness perspective. Yet, we question the claim that this is a new perspective, and argue that the reason for the claim of novelty is an insufficient use of references. This leads to the second topic, which is a discussion of citation practices in philosophical/ethics papers. We describe common deviations from academic standards, and suggest how unfortunate practices can be reduced.</span>
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2qLO3n9
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Background. Reconstruction of surgical defects following cranial base surgery is challenging. Others have demonstrated that leukocyte-platel...
-
During lytic infection, herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA is replicated by a mechanism involving DNA recombination. For instance, replication o...
-
Outcomes of multimodal management for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May 12;: Authors: Paré A, Blan...
-
Abstract Purpose Low back pain is a significant problem for school-aged athletes. Although some risk factors relating to sports activiti...
-
Thyroid cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the endocrine system and the incidence has been increasing in recent years. In a great ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου