Compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) planning, three-dimensional (3D) planning in orthognathic surgery yields more accurate anatomical information and enables the precise positioning of maxillary and mandibular segments, particularly for patients with facial asymmetry. Accordingly, surgical outcomes achieved using 3D planning should be superior. This study determined the differences between the 2D and 3D planning techniques by comparing their surgical outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2pRr2yp
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Background. Reconstruction of surgical defects following cranial base surgery is challenging. Others have demonstrated that leukocyte-platel...
-
During lytic infection, herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA is replicated by a mechanism involving DNA recombination. For instance, replication o...
-
IJMS, Vol. 18, Pages 1603: Induction of a Regulatory Phenotype in CD3+ CD4+ HLA-DR+ T Cells after Allogeneic Mixed Lymphocyte Culture; Indic...
-
Dracaena cochinchinensis Lour. is an ethnomedicinally important plant used in traditional Chinese medicine known as dragon’s blood. Excessiv...
-
Taking a slurry reservoir-pipeline-valve system as research object, axial dynamic vibrations of pipe system were induced by coupled hydrauli...
-
Women in Love by . Lawrence. Searchable etext. Discuss with other readers. from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Ino...
-
by Emily M. Zygiel, Karen A. Noren, Marta A. Adamkiewicz, Richard J. Aprile, Heather K. Bowditch, Christine L. Carroll, Maria Abigail S. Cer...
-
Publication date: February 2017 Source: Cryobiology, Volume 74 Author(s): Reza Masoudi, Ahmad Zare Shahneh, Armin Towhidi, Hamid Kohram, A...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου