Compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) planning, three-dimensional (3D) planning in orthognathic surgery yields more accurate anatomical information and enables the precise positioning of maxillary and mandibular segments, particularly for patients with facial asymmetry. Accordingly, surgical outcomes achieved using 3D planning should be superior. This study determined the differences between the 2D and 3D planning techniques by comparing their surgical outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2pRr2yp
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Pulmonary complications post hematopoietic stem cell transplant in dyskeratosis congenita: analysis of oxidative stress in lung fibrobl...
-
Masters Thesis Proposal Outline INTRODUCTION (1 PAGE) • What is the general topic area • Why this topic is relevant/important (how important...
-
Be a Responsible Dog Owner . Among companion animals, dogs are unmatched in their devotion, loyalty and friendship to humankind. Anyone who ...
-
is the premiere name in online OSHA Outreach training and safety courses. Our interactive courses include 10 hour and 30 hour OSHA Outreach,...
-
Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'! - Audrey Hepburn quotes from from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexa...
-
Abstract We present a case of small coronary sinus defect detected after transcatheter device closure of a large secundum atrial septal de...
-
An examination of the etiologic overlap between the genetic and environmental influences on insomnia and common psychopathology. Depre...
-
The Unusual Presentation of a Myxoma within the Sphenoid Sinus: Case Report and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr 19...
-
Publication date: Available online 5 April 2017 Source: European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases Author(s): C.A. Ri...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου