Compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) planning, three-dimensional (3D) planning in orthognathic surgery yields more accurate anatomical information and enables the precise positioning of maxillary and mandibular segments, particularly for patients with facial asymmetry. Accordingly, surgical outcomes achieved using 3D planning should be superior. This study determined the differences between the 2D and 3D planning techniques by comparing their surgical outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2pRr2yp
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1tk1BEi via IFTTT
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2p6KhjG via IFTTT
-
An in-depth look at what makes Rolex the industry leader and icon that they are, as we bring you inside the Rolex manufacturing facilities. ...
-
PSA! Has a TON of Scholarship Opportunities Right Now. SPOILER: college is crazy-expensive. Sorry. Did we spoil it? There are... from #Ale...
-
TAPinto.net Buddy Check9: Head, neck and throat cancers 9NEWS.com There are more than 70,000 Americans are diagnosed with head and n...
-
Purpose. To assess the long-term clinical outcomes of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate to high myopia. Methods...
-
Essay tungkol sa wika 2016 mary louise pratt essay diglyceride synthesis essay, issuu architecture dissertation pdf short essay 400 words es...
-
Abstract Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) may cause haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS). Age ≤5 years and presence of stx2a a...
-
Fun math practice! Improve your skills with free problems in 'Solve two-step equations' and thousands of other practice lessons. f...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου