Compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) planning, three-dimensional (3D) planning in orthognathic surgery yields more accurate anatomical information and enables the precise positioning of maxillary and mandibular segments, particularly for patients with facial asymmetry. Accordingly, surgical outcomes achieved using 3D planning should be superior. This study determined the differences between the 2D and 3D planning techniques by comparing their surgical outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2pRr2yp
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objective Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) provides opportunities for improved cost savings, but in the UK, implementation...
-
Abstract Purpose Overcoming the flaws of current data management conditions in head and neck oncology could enable integrated informatio...
-
CBN News Cancer Took Most of His Tongue, but This Pastor Is Still Singing ... CBN News A youth pastor in San Diego, California is not ...
-
Related Articles Audiologic and radiologic findings in cochlear hypoplasia. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Jan 10;: Authors: Cinar BC, Bat...
-
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in many countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resu...
-
Abstract The head-mounted display (HMD) has the potential to improve the quality of ultrasound-guided procedures. The aim of this non-clin...
-
http://ift.tt/2pnwWaQ
-
IJMS, Vol. 19, Pages 38: Recombinant Zika NS1 Protein Secreted from Vero Cells Is Efficient for Inducing Production of Immune Serum Directed...
-
Background. Globally 3 to 8% of reproductive age women are suffering from premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Several mental and reprodu...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου