Publication date: Available online 27 February 2017
Source:Clinical Biochemistry
Author(s): Davide Giavarina, Giuseppe Lippi
The extra-analytical phases of the total testing process have substantial impact on managed care, as well as an inherent high risk of vulnerability to errors which is often greater than that of the analytical phase. The collection of biological samples is a crucial preanalytical activity. Problems or errors occurring shortly before, or soon after, this preanalytical step may impair sample quality and characteristics, or else modify the final results of testing.The standardization of fasting requirements, rest, patient position and psychological state of the patient are therefore crucial for mitigating the impact of preanalytical variability. Moreover, the quality of materials used for collecting specimens, along with their compatibility, can guarantee sample quality and persistence of chemical and physical characteristics of the analytes over time, so safeguarding the reliability of testing. Appropriate techniques and sampling procedures are effective to prevent problems such as hemolysis, undue clotting in the blood tube, draw of insufficient sample volume and modification of analyte concentration. An accurate identification of both patient and blood samples is a key priority as for other healthcare activities. Good laboratory practice and appropriate training of operators, by specifically targeting collection of biological samples, blood in particular, may greatly improve this issue, thus lowering the risk of errors and their adverse clinical consequences.The implementation of a simple and rapid check-list, including verification of blood collection devices, patient preparation and sampling techniques, was found to be effective for enhancing sample quality and reducing some preanalytical errors associated with these procedures. The use of this tool, along with implementation of objective and standardized systems for detecting non-conformities related to unsuitable samples, can be helpful for standardizing preanalytical activities and improving the quality of laboratory diagnostics, ultimately helping to reaffirm a “preanalytical” culture founded on knowledge and real risk perception.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2mo2JHd
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Prof. Murray Leibbrandt - Professor and SALDRU Director. About Books and Book Chapters Publications and Working Papers. 021 650 2726: @: 3 ...
-
Astrophel' is a fanciful half-Greek anagram for the poet's own name, and Stella (Star) designates Lady Penelope Devereux, who at abo...
-
Publication date: Available online 8 April 2017 Source: Cortex Author(s): Jeremy Purcell, Rajani Sebastian, Richard Leigh, Samson Jarso,...
-
The impact of industrialised societies on Earth has been described in a mathematical formula that should scare us all, says Owen Gaffney ...
-
The compare and contrast essay is taught through modeling from the brainstorming phase through the first draft. from #AlexandrosSfakianaki...
-
Abstract: Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) have a well-known predisposition for certain types of malignancies, including lympho...
-
OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to explore the underlying genes associated with lung cancer (LC) by bioinformatics analysis. DATA AND METH...
-
La Traviata The soprano Diana Damrau gave her first performance as Violetta in Verdi’s “Traviata” as it returned to the Metropolitan Opera. ...
-
OBJECTIVE: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are epigenetic regulators of gene expression, and their deregulation plays an important role in human cancer,...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου