As surgeons we strive for improvement with every procedure, always aiming for better outcomes on the next procedure than the one that immediately preceded it. We typically use multiple methods of performance improvement, including utilizing preoperative planning with photographs, morphing, and sketches, as well as detailed surgical documentation. We evaluate our technical modifications by examining our surgical results, frequently drawing on standardized surgical outcome instruments. Fortunately for us, we have an increasing number of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in our toolbox, a previously underused tool in our approach to performance improvement. By inviting the direct feedback from patients through validated PROMs we gain critical information from the population whose opinion matters the most. In this issue of JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, Klassen et al share valuable information on the development and psychometric testing of the FACE-Q Cosmetic Eye Module.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2jEAWAh
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Objectives Patients undergoing osteoporosis treatment benefit greatly from early detection. We previously developed a computer-...
-
Publication date: Available online 20 March 2018 Source: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Author(s): Tobia...
-
Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance. Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):11-28 Authors: Haller S, Vernooij MW, Kuij...
-
IJMS, Vol. 19, Pages 177: Fusion Proteins of NKG2D/NKG2DL in Cancer Immunotherapy International Journal of Molecular Sciences doi: 10.3390/...
-
Related Articles Physician Dismissal of Families Who Refuse Vaccination: An Ethical Assessment. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(3):654-60 ...
-
Chicago's other mag mile: The second-highest-grossing shopping district in the city is a two-mile stretch of 26th Street on the Southwes...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου