Differentiation of High-Grade from Low-Grade Astrocytoma: Improvement in Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters from DCE MR Imaging by Using Arterial Input Functions Obtained from DSC MR Imaging.

Related Articles

Differentiation of High-Grade from Low-Grade Astrocytoma: Improvement in Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters from DCE MR Imaging by Using Arterial Input Functions Obtained from DSC MR Imaging.

Radiology. 2017 Dec 15;:170764

Authors: You SH, Choi SH, Kim TM, Park CK, Park SH, Won JK, Kim IH, Lee ST, Choi HJ, Yoo RE, Kang KM, Yun TJ, Kim JH, Sohn CH

Abstract
Purpose To evaluate whether arterial input functions (AIFs) derived from dynamic susceptibility-contrast (DSC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, or AIFDSC values, improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging for differentiating high-grade from low-grade astrocytomas, compared with AIFs obtained from DCE MR imaging (AIFDCE). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 226 patients (138 men, 88 women; mean age, 52.27 years ± 15.17; range, 24-84 years) with pathologically confirmed astrocytomas (World Health Organization grade II = 21, III = 53, IV = 152; isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant, 11.95% [27 of 226]; 1p19q codeletion 0% [0 of 226]). All patients underwent both DSC and DCE MR imaging before surgery, and AIFDSC and AIFDCE were obtained from each image. Volume transfer constant (Ktrans), volume of vascular plasma space (vp), and volume of extravascular extracellular space (ve) were processed by using postprocessing software with two AIFs. The diagnostic accuracies of individual parameters were compared by using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the Bland-Altman method were used to assess reliability. Results The AIFDSC-driven mean Ktrans and ve were more accurate for differentiating high-grade from low-grade astrocytoma than those derived by using AIFDCE (area under the ROC curve: mean Ktrans, 0.796 vs 0.645, P = .038; mean ve, 0.794 vs 0.658, P = .020). All three parameters had better ICCs with AIFDSC than with AIFDCE (Ktrans, 0.737 vs 0.095; vp, 0.848 vs 0.728; ve, 0.875 vs 0.581, respectively). In AIF analysis, maximal signal intensity (0.837 vs 0.524) and wash-in slope (0.800 vs 0.432) demonstrated better ICCs with AIFDSC than AIFDCE. Conclusion AIFDSC-driven DCE MR imaging PK parameters showed better diagnostic accuracy and reliability for differentiating high-grade from low-grade astrocytoma than those derived from AIFDCE. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

PMID: 29244617 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

from Imaging via alkiviadis.1961 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2CHGv7V