The opposition to Erasmus’ Novum Instrumentum was manifold. While Erasmus himself tried to present the debate about his work as an antagonism between humanism and scholasticism, the real reactions did not blend in such a simple scheme. Taking as an example the two theologians Maarten van Dorp and John Mair who were working at the universities of Louvain and Paris and who criticized Erasmus’ work from very different perspectives, this article illustrates the complexity of the (sometimes even humanist) motifs that stimulated their criticisms and reactions to Erasmus’ work.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AgfMOg
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Publication date: June 2017 Source: Anesthesiology Clinics, Volume 35, Issue 2 Author(s): Anair Beverly, Alan D. Kaye, Olle Ljungqvist, R...
-
Abstract Kimchi was prepared with different types of salts: purified salt (PS), solar salt aged for 1 year (SS1), aged for 3 years (SS3), a...
-
Abstract Although Nobori ® , with a bioresorbable polymer and biolimus A9 abluminal coating, has unique characteristics, few data exist re...
-
http://ift.tt/2rdV14q
-
Abstract In this study we investigated whether exerting an impulse on a Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) improves the success rate of CTO cro...
-
At the King’s Fund’s annual conference on leadership and management last week, NHS England’s chief executive, Simon Stevens, found an innova...
-
Zusammenfassung Nichtmelanozytärer Hautkrebs und seine Frühformen sind aufgrund von steigender Inzidenz und Prävalenz häufige Diagnosen im...
-
2016-10-05T05-46-18Z Source: International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Noha Seada, Mostafa G. M. Mostafa. Background: Heart...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου