The opposition to Erasmus’ Novum Instrumentum was manifold. While Erasmus himself tried to present the debate about his work as an antagonism between humanism and scholasticism, the real reactions did not blend in such a simple scheme. Taking as an example the two theologians Maarten van Dorp and John Mair who were working at the universities of Louvain and Paris and who criticized Erasmus’ work from very different perspectives, this article illustrates the complexity of the (sometimes even humanist) motifs that stimulated their criticisms and reactions to Erasmus’ work.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AgfMOg
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Pulmonary complications post hematopoietic stem cell transplant in dyskeratosis congenita: analysis of oxidative stress in lung fibrobl...
-
Background. Antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy is a highly effective but costly treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Me...
-
Abstract Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSCRT) is a rare malignancy most often seen in the abdomen or pelvis of young men. Unfortuna...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nGQ2DC via IFTTT
-
Article content meets expectations Minimal relevance to assigned subject matter. Article content fails to meet all requirements Not Rubric f...
-
Objective To determine the association between neuroendocrine tumor (NET) biomarker levels and the extent of disease as assessed by 68 Ga DO...
-
Elementary school kids, on the other hand, can read, write, reason and think highly complex thoughts. Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish, author...
-
by Mindaugas Paužuolis, Torsten Eich, Joachim Burman Background Natalizumab (NTZ) is a drug that has been widely used in the treatment of m...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου