The opposition to Erasmus’ Novum Instrumentum was manifold. While Erasmus himself tried to present the debate about his work as an antagonism between humanism and scholasticism, the real reactions did not blend in such a simple scheme. Taking as an example the two theologians Maarten van Dorp and John Mair who were working at the universities of Louvain and Paris and who criticized Erasmus’ work from very different perspectives, this article illustrates the complexity of the (sometimes even humanist) motifs that stimulated their criticisms and reactions to Erasmus’ work.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2AgfMOg
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Many different quantitative techniques have been developed to either assess Environmental Justice (EJ) issues or estimate exposure and dose ...
-
Leddsmerter kan ha mange årsaker. Traumatiske, immunologiske og infeksiøse lidelser må vurderes. En god anamnese kan sette oss på rett spor...
-
Variable Speed Limit Sign (VSLS) Systems enable speed limits to be changed dynamically in response to traffic conditions so that traffic inc...
-
Outcomes of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy-Directed Surgery for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Nov ...
-
Abstract An intriguing piece of evidence for the inflammatory story of type 2 diabetes has come to the light. A recent study by Okin and co...
-
The promise of omics-based approaches to cancer prevention. Semin Oncol. 2016 Feb;43(1):36-48 Authors: Meerzaman D, Dunn BK, Lee M, C...
-
Trends in Otolaryngology Consultation Patterns at an Academic Quaternary Care Center. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan 05;: ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου