Publication date: November 2017
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 86
Author(s): M.C. van Maaren, C.D. van Steenbeek, P.D.P. Pharoah, A. Witteveen, G.S. Sonke, L.J.A. Strobbe, P.M.P. Poortmans, S. Siesling
BackgroundPREDICT version 2.0 is increasingly used to estimate prognosis in breast cancer. This study aimed to validate this tool in specific prognostic subgroups in the Netherlands.MethodsAll operated women with non-metastatic primary invasive breast cancer, diagnosed in 2005, were selected from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Predicted and observed 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were compared for the overall cohort, separated by oestrogen receptor (ER) status, and predefined subgroups. A >5% difference was considered as clinically relevant. Discriminatory accuracy and goodness-of-fit were determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Chi-squared-test.ResultsWe included 8834 patients. Discriminatory accuracy for 5-year OS was good (AUC 0.80). For ER-positive and ER-negative patients, AUCs were 0.79 and 0.75, respectively. Predicted 5-year OS differed from observed by −1.4% in the entire cohort, −0.7% in ER-positive and −4.9% in ER-negative patients. Five-year OS was accurately predicted in all subgroups.Discriminatory accuracy for 10-year OS was good (AUC 0.78). For ER-positive and ER-negative patients AUCs were 0.78 and 0.76, respectively. Predicted 10-year OS differed from observed by −1.0% in the entire cohort, −0.1% in ER-positive and −5.3 in ER-negative patients. Ten-year OS was overestimated (6.3%) in patients ≥75 years and underestimated (−13.%) in T3 tumours and patients treated with both endocrine therapy and chemotherapy (−6.6%).ConclusionsPREDICT predicts OS reliably in most Dutch breast cancer patients, although results for both 5-year and 10-year OS should be interpreted carefully in ER-negative patients. Furthermore, 10-year OS should be interpreted cautiously in patients ≥75 years, T3 tumours and in patients considering endocrine therapy and chemotherapy.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2yA6tfm
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objective Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) provides opportunities for improved cost savings, but in the UK, implementation...
-
Caring for Patients with Physical Disabilities: Assessment of an Innovative Spinal Cord Injury Session that Addresses an Educational Gap Des...
-
Geriatric trauma: A population-based study Saint Shiou-Sheng Chen, Li-Chien Chien Formosan Journal of Surgery 2019 52(2):39-44 Background: G...
-
World Community; and Remarks on our Own Behalf Models of Anticipation Within the Responsible Research and Innovation Framework: the Two RRI ...
-
Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Where Are We Now? Objective: Over the last decade, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential...
-
Abstract Objective To study the effects of Astragalus polysaccharide (APS), the primary effective component of the Chinese herb medicine A...
-
http://orl-agios.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-preclinical-anticancer-effect-of.html Flavonoids present in foods were considered non-absorbable b...
-
Abstract Objective To evaluate Chinese medicine (CM) formula Bazheng Powder (八正散) as an alternative therapeutic option for female patients...
-
Abstract Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new anti-epileptic drug belonging to the dibenzazepine carboxamide family that is currently approved ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου