Abstract
Objectives
To identify alternatives for radiographers' postures while performing mammography that can contribute to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs).
Methods
Radiographers' postures to positioning craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views were simulated without any intervention for three scenarios: radiographer/patient with similar statures, radiographer smaller than patient and radiographer taller than patient. Actions were taken to modify the postures: seated radiographer; patient on a step; seated patient; radiographer on a step. All the postures were analysed using kinovea 0.8.15 software and the angles were measured twice and classified according to European standard EN1005–4: 2005.
Results
The non-acceptable angles were measured mainly during MLO positioning when radiographer was taller than the patient: 139° and 120° for arm-flexion and abduction, 72° for trunk and −24° for head/neck-flexion. The introduction of alternative postures (radiographer seated), allowed improvements in posture (60° and 99° for arm flexion and abduction, 14° for trunk and 0° for head/neck flexion), being classified as acceptable.
Conclusions
The alternative postures simulated have the potential to reduce the risk of developing WRMSDs when radiographers and patients have different statures.
Main messages
• Radiographers' postures in mammography can contribute to work-related musculoskeletal disorders
• Non-acceptable posture was identified for MLO breast positioning (radiographer taller than patient)
• Adapting posture to patient biotype reduces the WRMSD risk for radiographers
http://ift.tt/2sVWb5D
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου