In the early 1960s, expectant mothers who had been exposed to rubella in early pregnancy faced an agonising decision: let nature run its course and take the risk that their baby might be born with severe congenital abnormalities, or seek an abortion. This Hobsonian choice was not made any easier by the fact that in 1962 there was no reliable diagnostic test for rubella or that the symptoms were easy to miss. As one woman wrote to The Guardian after opting for termination in 1963, “I felt a deep elemental repugnance for what I was doing…[but] felt I had no choice”.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2r5pwG0
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Pulmonary complications post hematopoietic stem cell transplant in dyskeratosis congenita: analysis of oxidative stress in lung fibrobl...
-
Background. Antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy is a highly effective but costly treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Me...
-
Abstract Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSCRT) is a rare malignancy most often seen in the abdomen or pelvis of young men. Unfortuna...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nGQ2DC via IFTTT
-
Article content meets expectations Minimal relevance to assigned subject matter. Article content fails to meet all requirements Not Rubric f...
-
Objective To determine the association between neuroendocrine tumor (NET) biomarker levels and the extent of disease as assessed by 68 Ga DO...
-
Elementary school kids, on the other hand, can read, write, reason and think highly complex thoughts. Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish, author...
-
by Mindaugas Paužuolis, Torsten Eich, Joachim Burman Background Natalizumab (NTZ) is a drug that has been widely used in the treatment of m...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου