Publication date: April 2017
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 75
Author(s): Athanasios Tsalatsanis, Iztok Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic
BackgroundThe acceptable regret model postulates that under some circumstances decision-makers may tolerate wrong decisions. The purpose of this work is to empirically evaluate the acceptable regret model of decision-making in the end-of-life care setting, where terminally ill patients consider seeking curative treatment versus accepting hospice/palliative care.MethodsWe conducted interviews with 48 terminally ill patients to assess their preferences about end-of-life treatment choices. We first elicited the patient's regret of potentially wrong choices with regards to the recommended management and provided information on life expectancy estimated by two prognostication models. We then elicited the patients' level of acceptable regret by assessing their tolerance for potentially wrongly accepting hospice care versus continuing unnecessary treatment. Using the levels of acceptable regret, we computed: (1) the probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care and (2) the probability of death below which the patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment. We also assessed patients' understanding of the interview questions using a 7-point Likert scale.ResultsWe found that the median probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care was 96% (95% CI 94–98%), whereas the median probability of death below which a patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment was 2.5% (95% CI 0.3–5%). We also found that the levels of acceptable regret measured for wrong hospice referral (mean = 1.52; SD = 2.26; min = 0; max = 7.72) were similar to the levels of acceptable regret measured for unnecessary treatment (mean = 2.10; SD = 4.33; min = 0; max = 23) (KW test; p = 0.68) indicating that acceptable regret levels for either of the wrong decisions is felt similarly. The results were independent of the estimated probability of death communicated to patients before the acceptable regret interview.ConclusionsWe have elicited empirical data that corroborated the acceptable regret hypothesis. The requirement for high level of certainty before accepting recommended management may explain the difficulties related to decision-making in the end-of-life setting.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lrDd1Y
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objective Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) provides opportunities for improved cost savings, but in the UK, implementation...
-
Abstract Purpose Overcoming the flaws of current data management conditions in head and neck oncology could enable integrated informatio...
-
CBN News Cancer Took Most of His Tongue, but This Pastor Is Still Singing ... CBN News A youth pastor in San Diego, California is not ...
-
A middle-aged poorly controlled diabetic man developed left-sided orbital and facial swelling several days after extraction of a left upper ...
-
Related Articles Audiologic and radiologic findings in cochlear hypoplasia. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Jan 10;: Authors: Cinar BC, Bat...
-
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in many countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resu...
-
Abstract The head-mounted display (HMD) has the potential to improve the quality of ultrasound-guided procedures. The aim of this non-clin...
-
http://ift.tt/2pnwWaQ
-
IJMS, Vol. 19, Pages 38: Recombinant Zika NS1 Protein Secreted from Vero Cells Is Efficient for Inducing Production of Immune Serum Directed...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου