Publication date: April 2017
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 75
Author(s): Athanasios Tsalatsanis, Iztok Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic
BackgroundThe acceptable regret model postulates that under some circumstances decision-makers may tolerate wrong decisions. The purpose of this work is to empirically evaluate the acceptable regret model of decision-making in the end-of-life care setting, where terminally ill patients consider seeking curative treatment versus accepting hospice/palliative care.MethodsWe conducted interviews with 48 terminally ill patients to assess their preferences about end-of-life treatment choices. We first elicited the patient's regret of potentially wrong choices with regards to the recommended management and provided information on life expectancy estimated by two prognostication models. We then elicited the patients' level of acceptable regret by assessing their tolerance for potentially wrongly accepting hospice care versus continuing unnecessary treatment. Using the levels of acceptable regret, we computed: (1) the probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care and (2) the probability of death below which the patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment. We also assessed patients' understanding of the interview questions using a 7-point Likert scale.ResultsWe found that the median probability of death above which a patient would tolerate wrongly accepting hospice care was 96% (95% CI 94–98%), whereas the median probability of death below which a patient would tolerate unnecessary treatment was 2.5% (95% CI 0.3–5%). We also found that the levels of acceptable regret measured for wrong hospice referral (mean = 1.52; SD = 2.26; min = 0; max = 7.72) were similar to the levels of acceptable regret measured for unnecessary treatment (mean = 2.10; SD = 4.33; min = 0; max = 23) (KW test; p = 0.68) indicating that acceptable regret levels for either of the wrong decisions is felt similarly. The results were independent of the estimated probability of death communicated to patients before the acceptable regret interview.ConclusionsWe have elicited empirical data that corroborated the acceptable regret hypothesis. The requirement for high level of certainty before accepting recommended management may explain the difficulties related to decision-making in the end-of-life setting.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lrDd1Y
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Background Hyperthyroidism is associated with increased thrombotic risk. As contact system activation through formation of neutrophil extrac...
-
UM-Chor1: establishment and characterization of the first validated clival chordoma cell line. J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr 21;:1-9 Authors:...
-
Publication date: Available online 10 May 2017 Source: Journal of Dairy Science Author(s): R.E. Vibart, M. Tavendale, D. Otter, B.H. Schw...
-
Competency-based psychiatric education for Indian medical undergraduates Vijayalakshmi Pernenkil Archives of Mental Health 2019 20(1):1-2 Be...
-
Related Articles Developmental control of macrophage function. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017 Dec 13;50:64-74 Authors: Bonnardel J, Guillia...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2tcPIjn via IFTTT
-
Abstract: Epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI) is a rare disorder of cornification caused by mutations in KRT1 and KRT10, encoding two suprabasal e...
-
Bloomberg Celgene Settles Whistle-Blower Fraud Suit for $280 Million Bloomberg Even after the FDA approved Thalomid for multiple myelo...
-
Related Articles Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου