Fingerprint identification, as currently practiced by examiners, is a subjective evidence form in which a fingerprint examiner, based on their training and experience, is required to provide an expert opinion on a comparison of minutiae to determine whether a fingermark was created by a certain person as opposed to some other person. For the majority of the 20th Century, such testimonies have been very rarely challenged. However, in the wake of the Daubert decision by the Supreme Court in the USA, concerning expert evidence admissibility [1] and the 2009 report of the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) [2], there have been a number of questions raised regarding the scientific validity of forensic fingerprint identification [3–8]1.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2iHgNc5
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Objectives Patients undergoing osteoporosis treatment benefit greatly from early detection. We previously developed a computer-...
-
Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance. Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):11-28 Authors: Haller S, Vernooij MW, Kuij...
-
Publication date: Available online 20 March 2018 Source: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Author(s): Tobia...
-
Excerpt from Common Culture: Reading and Writing About American Popular Culture. Ed. Michael Petracca, Madeleine Sorapure. Upper Saddle Rive...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου