Cardiology

Retrieval of an embolised occluder with an alligator forceps during staged paravalvular leakage closure

Percutaneous closure of a large atrial septal defect presenting with acute severe hemolysis

Association between atrial fibrillation and Helicobacter pylori Abstract The connection between atrial fibrillation (AF) and H. pylori (HP) infection is still matter of debate. We performed a systematic review and metanalysis of studies reporting the association between AF and HF. A systematic review of all available reports in literature of the incidence of HP infection in AF and comparing this incidence with subjects without AF were analysed. Risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) and risk difference with standard error (SE) were the main statistics indexes. Six retrospective studies including a total of 2921 were included at the end of the selection process. Nine hundred-fifty-six patients (32.7%) were in AF, whereas 1965 (67.3%) were in normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Overall, 335 of 956 patients with AF were HP positive (35%), whereas 621 were HP negative (65%). In addition, 643 of 1965 NSR patients (32.7%) were HP positive while 1,322 were negative (67.3%; Chi-square 2.15, p = 0.21). The Cumulative Risk Ratio for AF patients for developing an HP infection was 1.19 (95% CI 1.08–1.41). In addition, a small difference risk towards AF was found (0.11 [SE = 0.04]). Moreover, neither RR nor risk difference were influenced by the geographic area at meta-regression analysis. Finally, there was a weak correlation between AF and HP (coefficient = 0.04 [95% CI −0.01–0.08]). We failed to find any significant correlation between H. pylori infection and AF and, based on our data, it seems unlikely than HP can be considered a risk factor for AF. Further larger research is warranted.

Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis Abstract Objective Classifying myocardial infarction into type 1 (T1MI) or type 2 (T2MI) remains a challenge in clinical practice. We aimed to identify factors contributing to variation in the classifications of MI into type 1 or type 2. In addition, pooled analyses of long-term mortality and reinfarction outcomes were performed. Methods We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science through January 2018 for observational studies or clinical trials classifying patients as either T1MI or T2MI. Studies with baseline characteristics allowing a comparison between both groups were included. Inverse variance random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RR). Results Overall, 93,194 patients from 20 included observational studies were classified as T1MI and 9291 as T2MI; corresponding to 87.9% and 8.8% of all patients diagnosed with MI. Inclusion of ST-elevation MI patients was inconsistent among studies. Coronary angiography was performed in 77.7% and 31.5% of all patients with T1MI and T2MI, respectively. From a subgroup of 11 studies, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 79.2% of all patients classified as T1MI (range 44.2–93.0%) and 40.2% of all T2MI patients (range 0–87.5%). A meta-analysis of 6 studies (44,366 in total) on 2-year mortality showed worse outcome among T2MI patients (RR: 1.52, CI 1.07–2.17, P = 0.02; I2 = 92%). Risk of reinfarction at 1.6 years was higher among T2MI patients (RR: 1.68, CI 1.22–2.31, P = 0.001; I2 = 9%). Conclusions Classification of T1MI and T2MI varies widely among studies. A standardized approach with clear definitions is needed to avoid misclassification and ensure appropriate patient management.

Direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists are linked to differential profiles of cardiac function and lipid metabolism Abstract Background Experimental data indicate that direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) may exert differential effects on cardiovascular disease. Methods Data from the prospective, observational, single-center MyoVasc Study were used to examine associations of DOAC as compared to VKA with subclinical markers of cardiovascular disease, cardiac function, and humoral biomarkers in heart failure (HF). Results Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and medications with correction for multiple testing demonstrated that DOAC therapy was among all investigated parameters an independent significant predictor of better diastolic function (E/E′: β − 0.24 [− 0.36/− 0.12]; P < 0.0001) and higher levels of ApoA1 (β + 0.11 g/L [0.036/0.18]; P = 0.0038) compared to VKA therapy. In propensity score-weighted analyses, the most pronounced differences between DOAC and VKA-based therapy were also observed for E/E′ (∆ − 2.36) and ApoA1 (∆ + 0.06 g/L). Sensitivity analyses in more homogeneous subsamples of (i) individuals with AF and (ii) individuals with asymptomatic HF confirmed the consistency and robustness of these findings. In the comparison of factor IIa and Xa-directed oral anticoagulation, no differences were observed regarding cardiac function (E/E′ ratio: βIIa inhibitor − 0.22 [− 0.36/− 0.08] vs. βXa inhibitor − 0.24 [− 0.37/− 0.11]) and lipid metabolism (ApoA1: βIIa inhibitor 0.10 [0.01/0.18] vs. βXa inhibitor 0.12 [0.04/0.20]) compared to VKA therapy. Conclusion This study provides the first evidence for differential, non-conventional associations of oral anticoagulants on cardiac function and lipid metabolism in humans. The potentially beneficial effect of DOACs in the highly vulnerable population of HF individuals needs to be further elucidated and may have implications for individually tailored anticoagulation therapy.

Impact of eplerenone on major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure according to baseline heart rate Abstract Background Increased resting heart rate is a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve cardiac sympathetic nerve activity, reduce heart rate and attenuate left ventricular remodelling. Whether or not the beneficial effects of MRA are affected by heart rate in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) is unclear. Methods We undertook a secondary analysis of data from the Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure study to assess if clinical outcomes, as well as the efficacy of eplerenone, varied according to heart rate at baseline. Results High resting heart rate of 80 bpm and above predisposed patients to greater risk of all outcomes in the trial, regardless of treatment allocation. The beneficial effects of eplerenone were observed across all categories of heart rate. Eplerenone reduced the risk of primary endpoint, the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation for heart failure, by 30% (aHR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54–0.91) in subjects with heart rate ≥ 80 bpm, and by 48% (aHR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33–0.81) in subjects with heart rate ≤ 60 bpm. Eplerenone also reduced the risks of hospitalisation for heart failure, cardiovascular deaths and all-cause deaths independently of baseline heart rate. Conclusions Baseline heart rate appears to be an important predictor of major clinical outcome events in patients with HFREF, as has been previously reported. The benefits of eplerenone were preserved across all categories of baseline heart rate, without observed heterogeneity in the responses.

Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies and outcome in patients with heart failure: insights from the German ablation registry Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist, but data on the prognostic value of differing ablation strategies according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are rare. Methods and results From January 2007 until January 2010, 728 patients with HF were enrolled in the multi-center German ablation registry prior to AF catheter ablation. Patients were divided into three groups according to LVEF: HF with preserved LVEF (≥ 50%, HFpEF, n = 333), mid-range LVEF (40–49%, HFmrEF, n = 207), and reduced LVEF (< 40%, HFrEF, n = 188). Ablation strategies differed significantly between the three groups with the majority of patients with HFpEF (83.4%) and HFmrEF (78.4%) undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation vs. 48.9% of patients with HFrEF. The latter underwent ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node in 47.3%. Major complications did not differ between the groups. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significant mortality increase in patients with HFrEF (6.1% in HFrEF vs. 1.5% in HFmrEF vs. 1.9% in HFpEF, p = 0.009) that was limited to patients undergoing ablation of the AV node. Conclusions Catheter ablation strategies differ significantly in patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF. In almost 50% of patients with HFrEF AV-node ablation was performed, going along with a significant increase in mortality rate. These results should raise efforts to further evaluate the prognostic effect of ablation strategies in HF patients.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients ≤ 75 years who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the SOURCE 3 Registry Abstract Background Current trials and registries of transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI) mostly include patients older than 75 years. Little is known about younger patients who undergo this treatment. We investigated comorbidities among patients < 75 years old who underwent TAVI in the SAPIEN 3™ European post-approval SOURCE 3 Registry, and analysed outcomes at 30 days and 1 year. Methods and results Three age groups of patients were analysed for outcomes and characteristics: < 75 (n = 235), 75–80 (n = 391) and ≥ 80 years (n = 1320). Overall, the mean age was 81.6 ± 6.7 years; transfemoral access was used in 87.1% of patients treated with SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valves. The mean logistic EuroSCORE increased according to age group (12.6%, 17.3% and 19.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Younger patients had a higher incidence of comorbidities, particularly those not included in surgical risk score assessment tools, e.g., severe liver disease, previous radiation therapy, and porcelain aorta. Mortality rates were similar between age groups at 30 days (1.7%, 2.0% and 2.3%, respectively, p = 0.79) and 1 year (14.2%, 9.3% and 13.3%, respectively, p = 0.08). However, sudden cardiac death rates were higher in the < 75 years age group compared with the ≥ 85 years age group (20.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.010). Conclusions In current TAVI practice, patients younger than 75 years are a minority (12%). Despite younger age and lower surgical risk scores, this cohort was characterized by comorbidities not accounted for by traditional surgical risk scores. More data are needed for this age group to guide the appropriate decision between surgery and TAVI. Clinicaltrial.gov number NCT02698956.

Prognostic significance of changes in heart rate following uptitration of beta-blockers in patients with sub-optimally treated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation Abstract Background In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on sub-optimal doses of beta-blockers, it is conceivable that changes in heart rate following treatment intensification might be important regardless of underlying heart rhythm. We aimed to compare the prognostic significance of both achieved heart rate and change in heart rate following beta-blocker uptitration in patients with HFrEF either in sinus rhythm (SR) or atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the BIOSTAT-CHF study. We evaluated 1548 patients with HFrEF (mean age 67 years, 35% AF). Median follow-up was 21 months. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 9 months. The combined primary outcome was all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation stratified by heart rhythm and heart rate at baseline. Results Despite similar changes in heart rate and beta-blocker dose, a decrease in heart rate at 9 months was associated with reduced incidence of the primary outcome in both SR and AF patients [HR per 10 bpm decrease—SR: 0.83 (0.75–0.91), p < 0.001; AF: 0.89 (0.81–0.98), p = 0.018], whereas the relationship was less strong for achieved heart rate in AF [HR per 10 bpm higher—SR: 1.26 (1.10–1.46), p = 0.001; AF: 1.08 (0.94–1.23), p = 0.18]. Achieved heart rate at 9 months was only prognostically significant in AF patients with high baseline heart rates (p for interaction 0.017 vs. low). Conclusions Following beta-blocker uptitration, both achieved and change in heart rate were prognostically significant regardless of starting heart rate in SR, however, they were only significant in AF patients with high baseline heart rate.

Transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation utilizing a novel vascular closure device with resorbable collagen material: a feasibility study Abstract Objectives We herein aimed to evaluate technical feasibility of transaxillary (Tax) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) utilizing a novel vascular closure device with a resorbable collagen plug and absence of suture material. Methods Between 05/2018 and 8/2018, eight patients (76.0 ± 5.9 years, 62.5% male, logEuroSCORE I 23.6 ± 4.7) received Tax-TAVI using the MANTA™ vascular closure device. Implanted transcatheter heart valves consisted of Edwards Sapien 3, NVT Allegra, Medtronic CoreValve EvolutR and SJM Portico. Results Puncture location depth was variable (3.5–7.5 cm). The left subclavian artery was used in five cases, the right subclavian artery in three cases. Low-pressure balloon-angioplasty for vessel closure was performed in 5/8 patients. VARC-2 defined device success was met in all patients. Major access site complication occurred in one patient with aneurysma spurium of the subclavian artery and consecutive stent implantation on postoperative day 5. Conclusion The MANTA™ device is applicable in Tax-TAVI, with potential particular advantages regarding easiness of use and marked access for subsequent interventions in case of vascular complications. Before conclusions regarding clinical efficacy and safety can be made, the device has to be evaluated in larger patient cohorts.

Alexandros Sfakianakis
Anapafseos 5 . Agios Nikolaos
Crete.Greece.72100
2841026182

6948891480

alsfakia@gmail.com