How Well Does Dual-energy CT with Fast Kilovoltage Switching Quantify CT Number and Iodine and Calcium Concentrations?

Publication date: Available online 21 December 2017
Source:Academic Radiology
Author(s): Shingo Ohira, Tsukasa Karino, Yoshihiro Ueda, Yuya Nitta, Naoyuki Kanayama, Masayoshi Miyazaki, Masahiko Koizumi, Teruki Teshima
Rationale and ObjectivesBecause it is imperative for understanding the performance of dual-energy computed tomography scanner to determine clinical diagnosis, we aimed to assess the accuracy of quantitative measurements using dual-energy computed tomography with fast kilovoltage switching.Materials and MethodsQuantitative measurements were performed for 16 reference materials (physical density, 0.965–1.550 g/cm³; diameter of rod, 2.0–28.5 mm; iodine concentration, 2–15 mg/mL; and calcium concentration, 50–300 mg/mL) with varying scanning settings, and the measured values were compared to their theoretical values.ResultsFor high-density material, the maximum differences in Hounsfield unit values in the virtual monochromatic images at 50, 70, and 100 keV were −176.2, 61.0, and −35.2 HU, respectively, and the standard deviations over short- and long-term periods were 11.1, 6.1, and 3.5 HU at maximum. The accuracy of the Hounsfield unit measurement at 50 and 70 keV was significantly higher (P < 0.05) with higher radiation output and smaller phantom size. The difference in the iodine and calcium measurements in the large phantom were up to −2.6 and −60.4 mg/mL for iodine (5 mg/mL with 2-mm diameter) and calcium (300 mg/mL) materials, and the difference was improved with a small phantom. Metal artifact reduction software improved subjective image quality; however, the quantitative values were significantly underestimated (P < 0.05) (−49.5, −26.9, and −15.3 HU for 50, 70, and 100 keV, respectively; −1.0 and −17 mg/mL for iodine and calcium concentration, respectively) compared to that acquired without a metal material.ConclusionsThe accuracy of quantitative measurements can be affected by material density and the size of the object, radiation output, phantom size, and the presence of metal materials.



from Imaging via alkiviadis.1961 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2kD1UaR