Publication date: November 2017
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 86
Author(s): Lotte Keikes, Miriam Koopman, Pieter J. Tanis, Valery E.P.P. Lemmens, Cornelis J.A. Punt, Martijn G.H. van Oijen
AimIn colorectal cancer care, many indicators for assessment and improvement of quality of care are being used. These quality indicators serve as national and international benchmarks to compare health care on hospital and patient level. However, the scientific basis of these indicators is often unclear. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to examine reported quality indicators used in multidisciplinary colorectal cancer care and categorise these indicators based on scientific evidence.MethodsWe searched PubMed from 2005 to 2015 for original articles reporting on development, evaluation or validation of quality indicators in colorectal cancer care. Included articles were categorised in consensus-based, evidence-based and validation cohort studies. Extracted quality indicators were divided into structure, process and outcome indicators and grouped per discipline(s) involved.ResultsFrom 1163 studies, 41 articles were included: 12 (29%) consensus-based, 7 (17%) evidence-based and 22 (54%) validation cohort studies. In total, we identified 389 reported quality indicators: consensus-based (n = 349), evidence-based (n = 7) and validation (n = 33), respectively. Of all reported indicators, 45% (n = 186) concerned surgical items. The vast majority were process indicators (n = 315; 81%) and the remaining outcome (n = 57; 15%) or structure measurements (n = 17; 4%). Only 5 indicators were reported in the majority (≥7/12 articles) of consensus-based papers and 7 indicators were successfully validated.ConclusionsThere is an abundance of reported colorectal cancer quality indicators, of which the majority are surgical, consensus-based process measures, which have not been validated in cohort studies. There is a need for international consensus on a limited evidence-based data set of validated quality indicators, with a focus on outcome indicators.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2jfXeKu
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Background Hyperthyroidism is associated with increased thrombotic risk. As contact system activation through formation of neutrophil extrac...
-
UM-Chor1: establishment and characterization of the first validated clival chordoma cell line. J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr 21;:1-9 Authors:...
-
Publication date: Available online 10 May 2017 Source: Journal of Dairy Science Author(s): R.E. Vibart, M. Tavendale, D. Otter, B.H. Schw...
-
Competency-based psychiatric education for Indian medical undergraduates Vijayalakshmi Pernenkil Archives of Mental Health 2019 20(1):1-2 Be...
-
Related Articles Developmental control of macrophage function. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017 Dec 13;50:64-74 Authors: Bonnardel J, Guillia...
-
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2tcPIjn via IFTTT
-
Abstract: Epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI) is a rare disorder of cornification caused by mutations in KRT1 and KRT10, encoding two suprabasal e...
-
Bloomberg Celgene Settles Whistle-Blower Fraud Suit for $280 Million Bloomberg Even after the FDA approved Thalomid for multiple myelo...
-
Related Articles Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου