The article discusses Peter Berger’s suggestion to replace the secularization theory by a "new paradigm" of a double plurality: the plurality of religions and the plurality (rather: polarity) of the religious and the secular sphere. Whether this constitutes a new paradigm seems just as questionable as whether it is a paradigm at all. After having discussed these two questions the article engages with the basic tenets of Berger’s concept by asking whether the paradigm is convincing. The discussion focusses on Berger’s concept of religion, which puts the secular and the religious sphere in opposition to each other – not only in the society but also in the consciousness of the religious subject.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2zH55Vy
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Objectives Patients undergoing osteoporosis treatment benefit greatly from early detection. We previously developed a computer-...
-
Publication date: Available online 20 March 2018 Source: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Author(s): Tobia...
-
Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance. Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):11-28 Authors: Haller S, Vernooij MW, Kuij...
-
IJMS, Vol. 19, Pages 177: Fusion Proteins of NKG2D/NKG2DL in Cancer Immunotherapy International Journal of Molecular Sciences doi: 10.3390/...
-
Related Articles Physician Dismissal of Families Who Refuse Vaccination: An Ethical Assessment. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(3):654-60 ...
-
Chicago's other mag mile: The second-highest-grossing shopping district in the city is a two-mile stretch of 26th Street on the Southwes...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου