The article discusses Peter Berger’s suggestion to replace the secularization theory by a "new paradigm" of a double plurality: the plurality of religions and the plurality (rather: polarity) of the religious and the secular sphere. Whether this constitutes a new paradigm seems just as questionable as whether it is a paradigm at all. After having discussed these two questions the article engages with the basic tenets of Berger’s concept by asking whether the paradigm is convincing. The discussion focusses on Berger’s concept of religion, which puts the secular and the religious sphere in opposition to each other – not only in the society but also in the consciousness of the religious subject.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2zH55Vy
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objectives Adult sagittal posture is established during childhood and adolescence. A flattened or hypercurved spine is associated with poore...
-
CBN News Cancer Took Most of His Tongue, but This Pastor Is Still Singing ... CBN News A youth pastor in San Diego, California is not ...
-
Objective Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) provides opportunities for improved cost savings, but in the UK, implementation...
-
Abstract Purpose Overcoming the flaws of current data management conditions in head and neck oncology could enable integrated informatio...
-
Family: Know the drill New Straits Times Online One of my sons had this so often that his tonsils were removed. ... However, for som...
-
The E3 ubiquitin ligase F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 (FBW7α) functions as a putative tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung canc...
-
In this study, the changes in pH, organic acid content, acidity, and salinity of kimchi prepared at 0 days, stored 1–8 weeks at 4 and 10°C, ...
-
When you make pizza this good you are allowed to brag about it. Come try a square of the best pizza in Erie. Ohhh yeah, we have ice cream no...
-
The March for Science reflects the growing gap between slow, steady, vital scientific gains and quick-fire, opportunist US politics, says D...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου