In the article titled “Negative and Positive Online Patient Reviews of Physicians—1 vs 5 Stars,” an incorrect type of online review cited has been corrected. In the Results section, “33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how honest the physician seemed to be” has been changed to “33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how knowledgeable the physician seemed to be.” This article has been corrected online.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lvwsfE
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance. Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):11-28 Authors: Haller S, Vernooij MW, Kuij...
-
Abstract Objectives Patients undergoing osteoporosis treatment benefit greatly from early detection. We previously developed a computer-...
-
Publication date: Available online 20 March 2018 Source: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Author(s): Tobia...
-
Excerpt from Common Culture: Reading and Writing About American Popular Culture. Ed. Michael Petracca, Madeleine Sorapure. Upper Saddle Rive...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου