Publication date: April 2017
Source:European Journal of Cancer, Volume 75
Author(s): Natacha Omer, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Perrine Marec-Berard, Antoine Italiano, Nadège Corradini, Carine Bellera, Laurence Brugières, Nathalie Gaspar
BackgroundThe most appropriate design of Phase-II trials evaluating new therapies in osteosarcoma remains poorly defined.ObjectiveTo study consistency in phase-II clinical trials evaluating new therapies for osteosarcoma recurrences with respect to eligibility criteria, response assessment, end-points, statistical design and reported results.MethodsSystematic review of clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu and French National Cancer Institute website or referenced in PubMed and American Society of Clinical Oncology websites, between 2003 and 2016, using the following criteria: (osteosarcoma OR bone sarcoma) AND (Phase-II).ResultsAmong the 99 trials identified, 80 were Phase-II, 17 I/II and 2 II/III, evaluating mostly targeted therapy (n = 40), and chemotherapy alone (n = 26). Results were fully (n = 28) or partially (abstract, n = 6) published. Twenty-four trials were dedicated to osteosarcoma, 22 had an osteosarcoma stratum. Twenty-eight out of 99 trials refer to the age range observed at recurrence (28%). Overall, 65 trials were run in multicentre settings, including 17 international trials. Only 9 trials were randomised. The primary end-point was tumour response in 71 trials (response rate, n = 40 or best response, n = 31), with various definitions (complete + partial ± minor response and stable disease), mainly evaluated with RECIST criteria (n = 69); it was progression-free survival in 24 trials and OS in 3. In single-arm trials evaluating response rate, the null hypothesis tested (when available, n = 12) varied from 5% to 25%.ConclusionNo robust historical data can currently be derived from past efficacy Phase-II trials. There is an urgent need to develop international randomised Phase-II trials across all age ranges with standardised primary end-point.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2loXIKY
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objective Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) provides opportunities for improved cost savings, but in the UK, implementation...
-
Abstract Purpose Overcoming the flaws of current data management conditions in head and neck oncology could enable integrated informatio...
-
CBN News Cancer Took Most of His Tongue, but This Pastor Is Still Singing ... CBN News A youth pastor in San Diego, California is not ...
-
A middle-aged poorly controlled diabetic man developed left-sided orbital and facial swelling several days after extraction of a left upper ...
-
Related Articles Audiologic and radiologic findings in cochlear hypoplasia. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Jan 10;: Authors: Cinar BC, Bat...
-
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in many countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resu...
-
The overall objective of the guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of lichen sclerosus (LS)...
-
Abstract The head-mounted display (HMD) has the potential to improve the quality of ultrasound-guided procedures. The aim of this non-clin...
-
http://ift.tt/2pnwWaQ
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου