In the phase 3 clinical trial by John Yaxley and colleagues,1 the only significant differences between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted prostatectomy were observed in hospital stay, blood loss, duration of surgery (minutes), time in operating room (minutes), and stress levels, which were all lower in the robot-assisted surgery group. However, the authors did not perform a cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness study, which could be very interesting because there are no significant differences in oncological or functional outcomes.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lwIaqy
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Vol.44 No.4 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1UqCPvn via IFTTT
-
Researchers have used an exciting new technology to successfully switch on dormant tumour suppressor genes in multiple cancer types. Dr Benj...
-
ACS Nano DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08172 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2naqGyD via...
-
Objective The study sought to compare angiographic and clinical outcomes of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) versus drug-coated ball...
-
Two methods, deposition method and ideal modeling based on lattice constant, are used to prepare three modulation periods’ (1.8 nm Cu/3.6 nm...
-
Perioperative medicine drives quality improvementAt West Suffolk Hospital, a 400 bed district general hospital in Bury St Edmunds, anaesthet...
-
Owing to the peculiarities of forest net primary production humans would appropriate ca. 60% of the global increment of woody biomass if for...
-
Abstract Purpose This study was undertaken to investigate the types of anorectal malformations (ARM), incidence of associated abnormalit...
-
Some states in India have made great strides in improving maternal and child health over the past decade, the fourth National Family Health ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου