Di Mario et al1 make an extremely important point about the nuances of infant feeding guidelines and the continued confusion that will result if we are not judicious in our interpretation of the science at hand.2 They argue that care should be taken to ensure precise descriptions of the outcomes of studies so that recommendations can be clear and consistent. In the case of infant feeding, this means interpreting the Learning Early About Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study results on the basis of design and findings of the trial.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2kbQ7ky
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Objective Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) provides opportunities for improved cost savings, but in the UK, implementation...
-
Abstract Purpose Overcoming the flaws of current data management conditions in head and neck oncology could enable integrated informatio...
-
A middle-aged poorly controlled diabetic man developed left-sided orbital and facial swelling several days after extraction of a left upper ...
-
Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has become the standard of care in many countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resu...
-
The overall objective of the guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of lichen sclerosus (LS)...
-
Abstract The head-mounted display (HMD) has the potential to improve the quality of ultrasound-guided procedures. The aim of this non-clin...
-
http://ift.tt/2pnwWaQ
-
Background. Globally 3 to 8% of reproductive age women are suffering from premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Several mental and reprodu...
-
ACS Nano DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01926 from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2pOw4te via...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου