We read with interest the Article by Duncan Porter and colleagues (July 16, p 239),1 and the accompanying comment by Tom Huizinga and colleagues (July 16, p 213).2 The results of this head-to-head trial1 showed that a treatment strategy with rituximab as a first-line biological drug was not inferior to a strategy with inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor (TNF), and also suggested that this strategy was associated with substantially lower health-related costs. Even if this economic assessment could be debated, because it has been made in the context of the UK health system and is not necessarily transposable to other health systems, the study is very convincing in favour of the clinical equivalence of the two strategies and the better cost-effectiveness of rituximab.
from #AlexandrosSfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2k7pv43
via IFTTT
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Excerpt from Common Culture: Reading and Writing About American Popular Culture. Ed. Michael Petracca, Madeleine Sorapure. Upper Saddle Rive...
-
Thesis Statement Creator: Directions: This web page explains the different parts to a thesis statement and helps you create your own. You ca...
-
Robert Schumann regnes som en av de store romantiske komponistene, særlig anerkjent er hans klaver- og kammermusikk. Han startet på utdanni...
-
Effect of titanium oxide and zirconium oxide nanoparticle incorporation on the flexural strength of heat-activated polymethyl methacrylate d...
-
Abstract Objectives Patients undergoing osteoporosis treatment benefit greatly from early detection. We previously developed a computer-...
-
Publication date: Available online 20 March 2018 Source: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Author(s): Tobia...
-
Related Articles Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου