Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire

Abstract

Elbow joint pathologies are highly prevalent in Persian-speaking countries. A reliable low-cost method like an appropriate questionnaire is mandatory for the early diagnosis of elbow joint disorders. Among designed questionnaires, Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) is an accepted commonly used scale evaluating pain and dysfunction of the patients. The aims of the study were to cross-culturally adapt and also to identify the psychometric properties of the Persian PREE. The original version of the PREE was translated and cross-culturally adapted to Persian according to the guidelines by Beaton et al. Seventy-three patients and thirty-nine healthy people were enrolled in the study. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were evaluated using ICC, Cronbach's alpha, and item-total correlation, respectively. Construct validity was investigated using Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and physical component scale of SF-36 (PCS). To determine a cutoff point for discriminating patients from non-patients, receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted. The Persian PREE displayed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91) and had acceptable ICC values in the subscales and total score (ICC > 0.90). A positive moderate correlation with DASH (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) and a negative moderate correlation with PCS of SF-36 (r = −0.44, P < 0.001) were observed. The cutoff point equal to 13.16 was determined for Persian PREE. The Persian PREE exhibited promising validity and reliability. The findings supported its applicability in clinical situations that were consistent with the original version.

http://ift.tt/2pgn56N